PECULIARLY PETE

  • Home
  • Contact

  • Pearl Harbour’s Little Brother – The Battle of Taranto

    Dear reader, it is customary, in the opening paragraph of one of my articles, to remind you of something you may know, as a springboard to letting you know about something that I think you don’t, but may find mildly interesting. Today differs only in that I have inserted this paragraph before that usual first paragraph, which is now the second.

    You are, dear reader, most likely aware of Pearl Harbour, the US Navy base in Hawaii that was attacked on the 7th December 1941 by aircraft of the Imperial Japanese Navy, taking the US forces by surprise and putting a serious (though as it proved, rather short term) dent in the naval capability of the United States. This attack brought the United States into the war, and is thus considered quite important. What you may not know is that the Japanese plan was based on the success of an attack just over a year earlier – by the British, on the Italians.

    Let us take a step back and consider for a moment why Britain was attacking Italy in 1940. The war had begun in 1939, with the invasion of Poland by Germany. Poland had quickly succumbed, and then in early 1940, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium and then France were all conquered by Germany in quick succession, leaving just Britain on the allied side. Following a victory in the summer of 1940 in the Battle of Britain, the UK continued to fight.

    Meanwhile, Germany’s ally Italy had not been idle, and was already engaging the British in British Somaliland and then Egypt. While the Italian army was not up to the same standards as the British, the advance continued and the British were pushed back as September progressed. It was immediately obvious that  the Mediterranean sea would also become a battleground, as both the British and Italians needed to send supplies using it.

    Here there arose a problem – the Royal Navy may well have been one of the most powerful navies on Earth at the time, but it had ships all over the place, to guard the Empire (which was still rather large). Increasingly, there was a need to protect convoys of supply ships from America to the UK, and so ships had been diverted. If that wasn’t enough, there was still the threat of German invasion of the British Isles, so ships had to be kept at home.

    It became clear that the British would not be able to gain control of the Med simply by having a naval battle with the Italians – they would have to get sneaky. And so they decided to use aircraft of the Fleet Air Arm (the arm of the Navy whose job it is to fly aircraft, generally from aircraft carriers) to sink the Italian fleet in port at Taranto. The attack was codenamed Operation Judgement.

    Originally, the force was to have comprised 36 aircraft from both HMS Illustrious and HMS Eagle, but in the end since Eagle was battle damaged she had to retire, leaving only 21 aircraft from Illustrious. I should explain that these were not cutting edge, fast mono-planes, but instead slow, rather outdated Swordfish bi-planes, from the delightfully named Fairey Aviation Company. They could, however, carry a torpedo and they were very durable.

    Nonetheless, on the night of the 11th November 1940, 21 of the brave little Swordfish took to the air from the deck of Illustrious. 11 of them carried torpedoes, the remainder armed with flares and bombs. The plan was rather simple – light the Italian ships up with flares, and then send in the torpedo bombers to put nice big holes in the sides of them.

    At around 2300, the first wave arrived, minus one aircraft that had turned back (possibly due to engine trouble, but they were in complete radio silence so none of the others would find out why). Italian ships were duly lit up and the torpedo-armed Swordfish began their attack. Over the next 10 minutes, and despite heavy anti-aircraft fire, 7 Italian ships would be crippled, including the battleships Littorio (she suffered 3 torpedo hits), Caio Duilio (she suffered one torpedo hit) and Conte di Cavour (she was sunk in harbour, having suffered multiple hits).

    The second wave of Swordfish began their attack around midnight. The Italians, now realising what was going on, had 800 anti-aircraft guns awaiting them, and these opened up as the flares once again lit up the night. It is surprising that these guns had little effect, although to be entirely fair, the second wave was formed of just 8 aircraft, and it was, as previously stated, the middle of the night.

    As the time reached 0120 on the morning of the 12th, the first Swordfish returned to Illustrious. Over the next 90 minutes, 17 more would land safely on her flight deck, leaving only 2 aircraft shot down. Tragic though this sounds, it must be remembered that this was an extremely low casualty rate for an operation of this kind. 2 of their crew were killed and 2 taken prisoner. It must also be remembered that this pales in comparison with the severe damage to 3 battleships and 2 cruisers of the Italian navy, along with oil stores and other shore facilities destroyed or badly damaged by bombs.

    Though the Italians had detected the aircraft sent on reconnaissance for the attack, they did not have good radar with which to detect the Swordfish, and were thus caught almost completely off-guard. Their vigilance was also poor.

    What did the world learn? Well, this was the first time a fleet had been defeated without ever sighting the opposing ships, and proved what some had already begun to suspect – that aircraft, not battleships, would be the weapons of the future. Admiral Andrew Cunningham, Commander-in-Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet at the time, would say: “Taranto and the night of 11 November 1940 should be remembered forever as having shown once and for all, that in the Fleet Air Arm, the Navy has its most devastating weapon”.

    Alas, this topic should really be given a much more thorough perusal, so if you are interested, I would highly recommend looking into it – I am sure there are many more interesting details than revealed here. If not, you can at least pass this article on to someone else who might enjoy it.

     

     

    December 2, 2018
    Fairey Swordfish, Fly Navy, Navy, Swordfish, War, World War 2, WW2

  • Winning Is Hard, and There Will Be Setbacks – What Happened After Midway

    The last photograph of USS Quincy (CA-39) – caught in Japanese searchlights and burning. (Note: Image NH50436 from the US Naval History & Heritage Command, public domain)

    June, 1942, Wellington, New Zealand. So far this corner of the world had been relatively untouched by the war; it was true that New Zealand’s armed forces (such as they were) had been mobilised and were taking part in the fighting in various theatres, but in terms of direct contact there had been none.

    This must have been a comforting thought to Major General Alexander Vandegrift; he had only been promoted to command of the U.S. First Marine Division in April, and the following month had been tasked with taking the division on its first ever foreign deployment. To simplify the logistics, various regiments and other units had been scattered around New Zealand, Samoa, and New Caledonia, with a more gradual buildup meaning that the last regiment would not arrive until the 11th July. None of that was a problem of course because Admiral Nimitz (Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet) had assured Vandegrift that the services of his Marine Division would not be required until at least the beginning of 1943.

    Vandegrift may have surveyed the situation in June with some misgiving, at least on the other fronts; in the Libyan desert, May 27th had seen the start of one of the greatest defeats in British Army history; having advanced well into Libya, the British, with their Indian, Australian and commonwealth allies had paused at the so-called Gazala line, awaiting further resources, many of which had already been diverted for the fighting in the far east. 

    What the British did not realise on the morning of the 27th was that Rommel was engaging in his most outlandish gamble yet; an incompetent Italian attack in the north was intended to pin down British forces, while he drove the vast majority of the Afrika Korps around the British line to the south, completely outflanking the line and trapping the forces on the Gazala line. This was not a plan that should have worked; and as the 27th turned into the 28th, it looked like it was Rommel, rather than the Gazala line, that should have been surrounded. Unfortunately, over the next few weeks, in a battle which displayed the worst of British hubris, bickering, and incompetence, and the best of German opportunism, the British 8th Army would be forced into an embarrassing retreat. Even Tobruk, which had famously held the year before, with its defences now un-maintained, fell quickly; it was only a mixture of heroic fighting and the woefully overstretched German logistics which saw them halted at the first (less famous) battle of el Alamein, but whether this would be a permanent halt, or merely a halt 90 miles west of Cairo, remained to be seen.

    Much further to the east, as June drew to a close, on the steppe of southern Russia, the men of 4th Panzer Army were limbering up, preparing their tanks to move out. They had every reason for confidence; at the second battle of Kharkov further south, German forces had annihilated a Soviet counterattack in one of the most one-sided slaughters of the war so far. True, the winter of 41/42 had been an uneasy time, but with the weather warm, the ground firm, and the skies full of Luftwaffe aircraft, the drive of the previous summer could be resumed.

    And so it was. 4th Panzer smashed into the relatively thin Soviet line and immediately began to drive towards Voronezh and the river Don. Soviet resistance was severely hampered by marauding German aircraft, while their own were shot down in their hundreds, or destroyed on the ground. Once again the Soviet Union was in peril; if the German advance continued, and they were able to cut off the oil fields of the Caucasus, the already shaky Soviet economy might be pushed over the edge. 

    In more immediate terms, the Japanese position remained a strong one in the Pacific. They may have lost much of their offensive striking power at Midway, but they were still in possession of huge swathes of Asia, vast amounts of natural resources, and a navy still capable of island hopping its way towards smaller objectives, complete with at least 2 modern aircraft carriers. The Allies were very well aware of the Japanese intention to continue fighting in the south west pacific, and not at all badly.

    Back in New Zealand, Vandegrift’s Marines were a mixture of a very small number of very experienced men who had been in the corps for decades (in such forgotten conflicts as the Banana Wars), and a very large number of raw recruits who were enthusiastic but had no combat experience at all. With very few exceptions, the Marines who had seen combat this war were either in Japanese captivity (and experiencing all the horrors thereof), or dead. None of that should have mattered however, because as far as the Marines were concerned, they would not be fighting until 1943.

    All of this was about to change, for reasons which were, at first, obscure. Far to the north west, several hundred miles to the north east of Australia, just east of New Guinea, lie the Solomon Islands. These volcanic islands jutting out into the Pacific had been occupied by various peoples since before the Bronze Age, but by the 19th Century had become colonial possessions, split between Britain and Germany. Britain had turned the whole of the area into BSIP, the British Solomon Island Protectorate, following the First World War, but despite their best efforts they had not managed to boost the population past a few thousand, with few white settlers. As the Japanese grew closer, even this small smattering of residents was evacuated, leaving a small number who elected to become coastwatchers, reporting to Australian intelligence by radio.

    Initially in 1942, there was not much to report. The Japanese did indeed eventually splash ashore in April, but even for them the islands were more of a pub quiz question than a military necessity, and so it was only a small number of naval engineers. Nevertheless, as the months progressed, things did start to happen which the coastwatchers found interesting; on one of the smaller islands, Tulagi, the piers and anchorage of a seaplane base were gradually taking shape. Australian intelligence passed this on to the United States. 

    Following Midway, U.S. Naval Command was quick to start thinking big. Admiral Nimitz, and his superior Admiral King, were already considering the possibilities for taking the initiative, and taking back territory. Knowing as they did that a seaplane base was taking shape off Tulagi, and that the Solomons were not fortified, it seemed a logical place to start. King ordered Nimitz to begin preparations to retake Tulagi and associated islands, with the operation (codenamed WATCHTOWER) to begin not later than 1st August. OVERLORD, the liberation of Normandy, would take nearly 2 years of planning; they had a handful of weeks.

    Almost immediately, things began to go wrong. King was acting without the joint chiefs of staff, and when General Douglas MacArthur (U.S. Army) heard that the Navy were planning an operation in a part of the south-west Pacific that had already been agreed as his prerogative, he went ballistic, threatening to withdraw any support from the operation. He did have a point; the Solomons were an awfully long way from any assets the Allies, and he had only a handful of B-17s that could even reach the Solomon Islands, no other aircraft that could be used, and no troops in any position to help. With a huge amount of inter-service argument (Admiral King threatened to go ahead regardless of the Army’s opinion), assuaged only by George Marshall (the very under-appreciated head of the U.S. Army), eventually WATCHTOWER was given the green light.

    Back in the Solomons, the attention of the coastwatchers had shifted from Tulagi to a larger island just to the south called Guadalcanal. In the relatively flat north of the island, the Japanese engineers were busy clearing away the jungle. Why they were doing this was a mystery; what could they be constructing in this backwater? It took some days, as the bulldozers crunched through more and more foliage, to work out, and only by taking several days of observation, as large, empty buildings started to go up, did it become obvious; what they were building was an airfield. This sent alarm bells ringing throughout the intelligence community. If the Japanese could finish this airfield, their aircraft could range deep into the pacific, and threaten the supply routes to Australia; the focus of the operation had to shift to Guadalcanal, and its importance had been dramatically underlined.

    With no land-based air power, it would fall to the Navy to use their aircraft carriers to support a landing. At the time these were under the command of Admiral Frank Fletcher, who had just fought at Coral Sea and indeed at Midway; even to Vandegrift, who was himself in his late 50s, Fletcher seemed to have aged immensely. Admiral Ghormley, who had been put in charge of the overall operation by Nimitz, for understandable reasons wanted to keep the air cover of the carriers for as long as possible. General Vandegrift had done his homework, and established that they would need at least 5 days to unload their supplies once landed; Fletcher, under the strain of months of operations, and knowing that the Japanese could do to him what he had done to them at Midway, offered just 2 days. 

    This only added to Vandegrift’s unease; his practice runs in Fiji had gone poorly; his young troops simply had no idea how to co-ordinate a complicated amphibious landing. Worse still, the one definite advantage that U.S. troops should have had, the superb, semi-automatic M1 Garand rifle, was not available, as a result of squabbling about its durability, and admin delays, none of the Marines were actually armed with them. Instead they would go into battle armed with a mix of bolt-action M1903 rifles, interspersed with M1918 Browning Automatic Rifles (BARs). In case you were wondering, both 1903 and 1918 refer to the introduction dates of those weapons; that’s right, they would be assaulting the Japanese with weapons entirely familiar to their fathers in WW1. Nor would they be going in with particularly state of the art landing craft. We modern people will doubtless picture the landing craft with a big ramp at the front, no doubt tinged a little by the opening scene from Saving Private Ryan, but while these were starting to appear (along with amphibious tracked vehicles which would later become the iconic AmTrack), most of the Marines would have to clamber over the side of Higgins Boats, and wade ashore from there. 

    Even that most basic of aids to an amphibious landing, an accurate map, was absent; the only maps available had been drawn up in the late 19th century, their soundings of the sea depth were long out of date, and they had no maps at all of the interior of the islands. In the end they could only rely on the testimony of the few Solomon Islanders, which only gave a very rough idea of what they could expect.

    At this critical juncture, industrial relations (of all things) became an issue, as the civilian longshoremen in New Zealand who were supposed to load the transport ships decided to go on strike. With no clear alternative, Vandegrift instructed the Marines (who had had no training in this sort of thing) to load the ships themselves. Far from the high-sounding WATCHTOWER, the troops began to call the forthcoming operation SHOESTRING, and Admiral Fletcher’s eventual offer of 3 days of air cover (still short of the 5 days really needed) did little to ease his concerns.

    Still, the fleet which eventually assembled (about a week behind the original timeline) was formidable; it consisted of the fleet carriers Saratoga, Enterprise, and Wasp, heavily protected by a screen of cruisers, destroyers, and even the new fast battleship North Carolina which was barely a year old. The transport fleet (led by Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner), was escorted by the Australian heavy cruisers Australia and Canberra, paired with the USS Chicago, the Australian light cruiser Hobart and no fewer than 9 destroyers (interestingly, this escort group was commanded by Read Admiral Victor Crutchley, RN. Yes, RN as in Royal Navy, he was British). They could also call on a further 3 heavy cruisers, an anti-aircraft light cruiser and a further 6 destroyers for fire support to the landings.

    Warming up in the half-light of the morning of the 7th August, on the sun-bleached wooden flight decks of the U.S. carriers (among all the other aircraft we talked about last time) were Grumman F4F Wildcat fighters. This was the very same type that had fought at Coral Sea and Midway, the backbone of American air strength thus far in the war, and on paper a very modern aeroplane; the Wildcat was of all-metal, stressed skin construction; it had a retractable undercarriage, and its 9 cylinder Pratt & Whitney radial engine featured a 2 stage supercharger, bringing power up to a respectable 1200 hp, and drove a metal, 3 blade, constant speed propeller.

    These facts belied the truth about the Wildcat. As its pilots had known all along, the Wildcat had some significant shortcomings compared with its main opponent, the Mistubishi A6M Zero; the Zero was not only faster in a straight line, it was also more manoeuvrable in all axes, could climb faster, and could outrange its U.S. contemporaries. Even the “upgrades” that had been made from the -3 to -4 model had been of dubious benefit; the folding wings may have allowed more Wildcats to be stored on a carrier, but they had made the wings even heavier, compounded by the update from 4x to 6x .50 calibre machine guns (4 was generally held to be perfectly adequate, and 6 guns not only made the aircraft heavier, but reduced the rounds per gun that could be carried, so they had less firing time). Despite their efforts, nothing had made this aeroplane, which started life as the F3F biplane, any more formidable.

    Nevertheless, the Wildcat did have some real strengths which are not at first obvious, and it was generally well-liked by its pilots. The engine was extremely reliable and durable, and being air cooled there was no cooling system to fail or get damaged. While she was a heavy aircraft for her size, that weight had been spent on the whole wisely; the fuel tanks were self-sealing, and the pilot was well-protected by armour plating. The airframe too was legendarily strong, and it was this strength which bought the Wildcat its primary advantage over the competition; it could dive at well over 500 mph, which the more fragile Zero could not follow, a comforting thought for the pilots scanning their instruments on that morning.

    With the dawn, aeroplanes began to launch from the U.S. carriers, and set a course for Guadalcanal, Tulagi, and the amusingly named Florida Island. The fire support ships drew closer to the shore, and along with the dive bombers from the carrier began to turn Tulagi and the northern shoreline of Guadalcanal into swiss cheese. 8 inch and 5 inch naval guns roared, as the first of the troops, the Marine Raiders (a sort of proto-special forces, but until they get a series called Marine Raiders: Rogue Heroes, will not get much attention this side of the pond), stormed Tulagi. Comfortingly, the only Japanese aircraft turned out to be the seaplanes at their base, which were quickly put out of action.

    However, General Vandegrift cannot have been put at ease by their performance on Tulagi. Japanese resistance was greater than expected, with the raiders taking far more casualties and time to achieve their objectives. If this was the reception on the relatively small and un-airfielded Tulagi, the much larger Guadalcanal seemed a daunting prospect. With no prospect of turning back, the transports pushed on as the sun rose high, and nerves rose higher, Marines climbing down into their boats and motoring towards the northern shore. A combination of nerves and the swell made sea sickness rife. With the smell of cordite filling the air, the boom of naval gunfire and the scream of aircraft overhead, expecting the Japanese to be waiting for them, the boats hit the beach, soldiers leaping over the side.

    And then… nothing. No-one. It seemed eerie at first, but the landing was entirely un-opposed. Without knowing why, there was a scramble to unload transports, to get the men ashore what they would ultimately need to carry out the operation, as advanced parties began to snake their way through the jungle to surround the airfield. Unfortunately, the Marines had managed to load many of their transports backwards; what you are supposed to do is load the things that you need immediately (usually weapons, ammunition etc.) last; this means that when you unload the transport, those things are available first. In the confusion of the longshoreman’s strike and a lack of experience, the Marines found in many cases their weapons and ammunition were in fact underneath tents, canteens, and other longer term items. In a desperate scramble, they threw them into the sea, or scattered them across the beach, in a repeat of the chaos of their practice runs. 

    They were relying on luck, not knowing when the Japanese might strike, and time was already running out, a fact dramatically underlined by the appearance of Japanese aircraft, fighting running battles with the U.S. Wildcats, and not doing at all badly. Fletcher began to worry about losses. The Marines began to wonder how long it would be before their transports were hit.

    At least initially though, their luck appeared to be holding. The first of the light tanks began to run ashore, their 37 mm guns doubtless a comforting presence, and the advance parties of Marine Raiders were not encountering much resistance. Even the night of the 7th passed relatively peacefully, as they continued to encircle Lunga point, the area where the Japanese airfield-to-be was located. The 8th saw sporadic fighting, and more frantic unloading on the beaches, but no significant setbacks for the allies; or so it seemed. By nightfall, the airfield was in U.S. hands, and had even acquired a new name; Henderson field, after a Marine Corps aviator killed at Midway. 

    Meanwhile, to the northwest, Admiral Crutchley (RN) and his cruisers and destroyers had been guarding the approaches, to prevent any Japanese naval units breaking through to the transport ships still unloading. They felt pretty confident they could do this; after all, at least some of Crutchley’s cruisers were equipped with radar, something the Japanese were known to have not equipped. In theory, they would get further advance warning even than their radar. Not only did the Australians have a network of coastwatchers who could radio in sightings, they also had reconnaissance aircraft operating out of Milne Bay in New Guinea, perfectly placed to spot any ships coming down from the Japanese fleet base at Rabaul. 

    Unfortunately, theory and practice somewhat differ. The aircraft did indeed spot the Japanese force of cruisers and destroyers, and made several attempts to radio this sighting in. When this did not appear to work, they returned to base and personally reported the sighting to their superiors, but this was never passed to the U.S. or Royal navies, so Crutchley was unaware. While it was not immediately obvious, the radar of the time could not differentiate friend from foe, and so as the Japanese crept into Crutchley’s formation, they failed to raise alarm bells on the allied ships.

    A star shell exploded over the allied ships, turning day to night, as Japanese 8 inch shells rained on the startled Americans and Australians off Savo island. They might have fought back bravely, but they had no idea precisely where the Japanese force was, and the result was a tragedy for the Allies. By daybreak on the 9th August, 1,077 Allied sailors would be dead, 4 heavy cruisers would be sunk, with another damaged, and the remnants of the force would limp back east to lick their wounds. The Japanese cruisers (under Admiral Gunichi Mikawa) had all the time in the world to break off, see to their relatively minor damage, and were well outside the range of allied air cover the following morning. 

    This Battle of Savo Island precipitated a dramatic turn of events on the Allied side. Admiral Fletcher, already nervous about the prospect of a run-in with the Imperial Japanese Navy, running short of fuel and having taken much higher aircraft losses than he was comfortable with, announced that he was going to withdraw the Enterprise, Saratoga, and Wasp, along with their escorts, and steam south to refuel. Ghormley, taken by surprise at the soon-to-be-absent air cover, was left with the choice of leaving the transports there, to be picked off by Japanese air and naval attacks, or withdrawing them to safety. He chose the latter. With barely half of their supplies ashore, Vandegrift’s 1st Marine Division, all 11,000 of them, were abandoned in the Solomons, hundreds of miles from the nearest Allied base, with no air cover and at best weeks until relief. 

    The U.S. Marines are not famed for sitting around waiting to be destroyed. Thus it was that Vandegrift set them to work; their great hope was that if they could get the airfield operational, they could base their own aircraft there, giving them a measure of protection against aerial attack, and some real striking power of their own. Work began on extending the runway, and sorting through what supplies they had captured from the enemy. Other marines were put to work building a defensive perimeter around the airfield and beachhead, digging in emplacements for artillery, machine gun nests, scraping out foxholes, anything to impede the inevitable Japanese counter attack. With much of their equipment either dumped in the sea or heading off in the wrong direction, they improvised, taking what the Japanese had left behind, stringing up their own barbed wire against them. Still others began to patrol the jungle, scouting for enemy presence that was eerily elusive, but they knew must come one of these days.

    Some problems became apparent almost immediately. A warm island in the Pacific sounds almost like a pleasant holiday destination, however, a warm Pacific island with extremely high humidity, low lying stagnant water, hordes of mosquitoes and other insects, is not so much a restful vacation and more a breeding ground for disease. Malaria and other fevers sprang up within days. 

    Malarial treatment in 1942 was going through something of a revolution. For centuries, Malaria had been treated with Quinine, which is derived from the bark of a particular species of Peruvian tree. It was relatively obscure until it was used to cure Charles II, and from that point on, became the go-to treatment. The only real drawback of Quinine was its bitter taste, but mixed with a little sugar and water it could be turned into an easily consumed tonic (incidentally the origin of the tonic water we now use with gin). Unfortunately for Vandegrift’s marines, a nice G&T was not on the cards; thanks partly to the shortage of fresh water, but mostly because, owing to supply chain difficulties, the drug they actually had to hand was not Quinine but the relatively new Atabrine, a synthetic alternative that had been synthesised barely a decade previously. It did work in treating Malaria, but the side effects could be easily worse; dizziness, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and (strangely) yellow skin discolouration were all reported, and often with wrong dosages did occur. A rumour did the rounds that Atabrine caused erectile dysfunction and sterilisation (although neither are reported in the medical literature, there is a note on the Wikipedia page that there were attempts to use it in female sterilisation, although when, and with what dose is not clear), which was completely false, but it did stop some marines from taking the tablets which led, surprise surprise, to more malaria.

    There was bad news for the marines even if they had not succumbed to tropical disease. With over half their supplies either in the sea itself or sailing away towards New Zealand, the stock cupboard was bare. They might have been digging in, but they estimated they had just 3 days worth of ammunition, not enough for a prolonged battle. Worse (and more immediate) news came from their stocks of food, or lack thereof. Very few of their rations had made it ashore; to ward off complete starvation they would have to turn to the large stocks of rice Japan’s naval engineers had kindly left behind. Unfortunately the Japanese hadn’t been kind enough to store the rice properly, and so by the time the marines were actually eating it, it had become infested with weevils, worms, and maggots, something boiling it only partially removed. Worse still, there was not enough of it to support 11,000 marines for months; at times they would be down to just two tablespoons of rice a day.

    Suffice to say, all the above, coupled with sleeping in the open (their tents having been thrown largely into the sea), made life extremely uncomfortable. Weight loss was severe on men already somewhat malnourished from the Great Depression, and the psychological impact of being abandoned, not knowing when the enemy were going to strike, took its little toll on the souls of men, not helped by the Japanese flying aircraft overhead at night, dropping the odd small bomb, just to keep the Americans awake.  The tension would carry on for 13 days.

    It was at this point that two important things happened. On the 20th, the first U.S. aircraft arrived, a mixture of Marine Corps Wildcats and SBD Dauntless Dive Bombers. The reality was they had been put together somewhat hastily, the pilots had barely had a month of training after leaving flight school, and had been launched from the aircraft carrier USS Long Island, which sounds impressive, but was actually a converted merchant ship, with such a small flight deck the Marine Corps aviators had had to endure a very risky catapult launch. Nevertheless, as the first Dauntless arrived, General Vandegrift ran out to shake the pilots hands, almost pathetically stating “thank God you’re here”.

    This was actually just the latest in a series of small attempts to keep the Marines supplied; the odd ship had made it through to land some supplies in the intervening two weeks. Speaking of supplies, Fletcher and his carriers had also not been idle; they had retreated to Noumea, a port in the then-French possession of New Caledonia, replenished their air group losses with new Wildcats, Dauntles and Avengers, restocked ammunition, and were already back to sea, armed this time with some extra intelligence. The Japanese were at sea.

    Frank “Jack” Fletcher may have been reluctant to risk his carriers to save a tiny ex-British island he doubted the Marines could hold, but he was quite prepared to send them out to hunt down the Imperial Japanese Navy. He had sent the carriers racing down to the Coral Sea, had pushed for Saratoga to get out in time for Midway, and now he was going to do it again. Intelligence suggested that a large Japanese force had assembled at the Japanese base at Truk, probably including the Zuikaku and Shokaku, the last surviving large carriers the Japanese possessed, and perhaps including the converted liner Ryujo into the bargain, and Fletcher was determined to find them and put them on the bottom.

    The second important thing that happened was that the Japanese Army finally attacked. This too was not entirely unexpected; on the 19th, hearing rumours of Japanese presence, a patrol made up of Marines, some British and Australian coastwatchers, and a mixture of other Solomon islanders, had gone out beyond the perimeter, and picked their way carefully through the jungle to a place called Koli point. The man up front motioned for the others to keep their heads down, and pointed out figures, dressed in the unmistakable khaki of the Japanese army. Clearly, somewhere on the island they had landed, and they too appeared to be patrolling, looking for trouble with the Americans. In a stroke of luck, they did not seem to have noticed the allied patrol, and so, ever so carefully, ever so quietly, the 60 men crept into an ambush position, the tension excruciating in the heat and stifling humidity of an August day in the south Pacific. With a sharp intake of breath, rifles cracked, and Japanese fell; to their credit they reacted quickly, returning fire, killing 3 of the Marines, but in a brutally short action, the bodies of the Japanese soldiers lay shot through, limp in their uniforms. Something even more important, however, was evident in the pockets of those uniforms; plans and insignia. It appeared that this patrol was part of a much larger unit (though exactly how large was not clear), and that they were intending to attack the Marine positions.

    The focal point of this attack was an area known the Marines as Alligator Creek (in reality these were crocodiles, but not having left the USA before, most Marines would not know the difference). This is an area where the river Tenaru flows down towards the sea near a place called Lunga Point, and the river with its associated banks was a natural place to anchor the eastern defences of Henderson Field.  19th August turned to the 20th, and the 20th eased into the 21st. 

    And it was at precisely this point, in the moonlit darkness just past midnight, that the usual sounds of the jungle were subtly interrupted. Marines in foxholes on the east side of the creek could hear the small but subtle noise of men whispering to one another, and not in English, accompanied by the rustle of equipment. Sensibly, the Marines fell back quietly over the river, and deployed in their prepared positions, behind a single strand of barbed wire. Gun crews manned their 37 mm weapons, 1903 Springfield rifles were pulled up into the shoulder… and just then the sky to the east flashed, the rustling replaced with the boom of mortars landing among the Marines. A great mass of Japanese men pushed their way down the bank and into the river, wading across, chanting, but they never stood a chance, as the Marines struck back with their own mortars and 37 mm guns, firing canister shot filled with ball bearings. The immense din was joined by the crack of rifles as the Japanese reached the western bank, but just as soon as it started, the attack petered out, bodies floating in the river, ghostly in the dim light, others laying as misshapen, crumpled heaps on the west bank. 

    The peace was not to last. At 02:30, the Japanese tried again, using very similar tactics, and again, in a cacophony of rifle fire, canister shot, and mortars, they were cut down. As the sun began to rise, at around 05:00, Japanese troops attempted to flank the creek completely, moving around the beach at Lunga Point, but this open ground proved ideal for machine gun fire and allowed the Marine artillery, such as it was, to range in on them with ease. Not all were killed, but the Japanese did something quite rare here; they abandoned the attack, falling back east towards the east bank of the Tenaru.

    As the sun rose further, the Marines were able to play their trump card. Over on Henderson field, the brief whir of electric motors was cut by the spluttering of gasoline in cylinders, as the Pratt & Whitney engines of the SBD dive bombers thundered to life. Within minutes they were in the air, and tossing 500 lb bombs among the remaining Japanese troops, followed shortly thereafter by the guttural screams of Marines, as, bayonets fixed, they charged across the river and slaughtered what remained of the Japanese force.

    It was here they discovered a lesson which had never been fed back to the states; the Japanese did not surrender easily, even in the most hopeless of circumstances. Several wounded men would scream for help, before then trying to pull the pins on grenades and take a Marine with them. Only quick marksmanship had saved many a Marine from a grizzly fate. Other Japanese attempted to escape back onto the beach, and only the quick intervention of the few tanks on the island prevented them from causing more casualties. Nevertheless, Marine morale was good, and deservedly so; what they had just done was something almost unheard of in 1942; they had defeated a Japanese land force, and decisively so. The “Ichiki” detachment, nearly 900 strong and including their Colonel Ichiki, had been wiped out for less than 100 marine casualties.

    The next day, as the US Navy and IJN swept through the south west Pacific, there was some more good news for the weary Marines on Henderson Field, because the U.S. Army Air Force was coming to the party. As the 22nd wore on, the air once again filled with the noise of aircraft engines, and coming in low over the jungle turned out to be the P-39 and P-400 Airacobras of the 67th Fighter squadron. Exactly how the Marines reacted is unfortunately lost to history (one imagines a lot of them barely noticed) but those more familiar with aircraft might have been a little dismayed.

    They would have been dismayed because even at this early stage, the Airacobra was developing a bad reputation. It was a very unusual looking aeroplane for its day, with a “tricycle” undercarriage (virtually all modern aeroplanes have this layout but at the time, anything other than a “taildragger” was very rare), the engine mounted in the middle, and with a “car door” to get in, rather than the usual opening canopy. It also had a very unusual armament, at least for an American aircraft, in that it had a cannon firing through the propeller hub, and a mixture of .30 and .50 calibre machine guns, two firing through the prop, and the other two in the wings. None of this should necessarily have crippled the reputation of the aircraft, but it was all very odd.

    One big factor in the Airacobra’s unpopularity was its engine. In common with many U.S. fighters at this time, both the P-39 and P-400 were fitted with Allison V-1710 engines. On paper, this should have been a fine engine, in many ways comparable to the legendary Rolls-Royce Merlin, with both engines being 60o V-12s, both having four valves per cylinder, and both having overhead camshafts. Even the displacements were similar; the Merlin was a 27 litre, with the V-1710 being around 28 litres. They were so similar in fact that in many aircraft, either engine could be equipped.

    The big difference between the two is in how they are supercharged. The Merlin featured a large, two-speed centrifugal supercharger that was continuously tweaked and upgraded, whereas the Allison (at least from the factory) only came with a small, single speed centrifugal blower. While this was still technically a supercharger (many sources claim that they had no supercharger at all, which is not true, there is no way that the Allison would have been making 1200 hp without one), it really restricted what the engine could do.

    Allow me to explain; internal combustion engines, in very basic terms, burn a fuel with oxygen from the air. As you go higher of course, the air gets thinner. This is why people climbing Everest often need their own oxygen supply, and it plays havoc with engines, as without much oxygen around, they struggle to burn fuel, vastly reducing their power. What is needed is some way to force more air into the engine, and the supercharger, which draws more air in and compresses it before it enters the engine, did just that. The trouble is (to massively oversimplify), having just one speed or stage limits how much pressure can be generated, and this gets worse as the air gets thinner and thinner. This resulted in a dramatic drop-off in the power of the Allison above 14,000 ft as the engine simply was not getting enough air to burn the fuel to make more power. As a lot of the air combat was happening above this height, the Airacobra was really struggling; even at lower heights where the Airacobra was fast, Japanese fighters diving down from above could and did outpace the unlucky Americans.  Before long, the Marine Corps Wildcats (with their two stage superchargers) would be grabbing most of the glory, with the USAAF planes desperately trying to run away, until a new role could be found for them.

    None of this, it should be noted, was Allison’s fault, nor can blame really be laid at Bell Aircraft (the Airacobra’s manufacturer). See in the 1930s, the USAAF was investing heavily in turbochargers, which is in essence the same thing as a supercharger except driven from the exhaust of the engine, rather than being mechanically driven from the crankshaft. Both the P-38 Lightning and the P-47 Thunderbolt would go on to be very successful with these turbochargers, so it definitely worked out in the end, but as a result of this obsession, Allison were instructed to design an engine with only a second stage blower, as it was assumed that the first stage would come from a turbocharger. In fact the early concept for the Airacobra (and the first prototype) were designed for this turbocharger, which never materialised, being far too bulky to fit into a small fighter. As a result all the production aeroplanes had only that single blower.

    The pilots and crews of the P-400s probably felt even less confident. Otherwise identical to the P-39, the P-400 has a different designation because it was designed for the British. Back in the dark days of 1940, with a German invasion seemingly imminent, the Air Ministry were none too picky about what they would order; Bell had sold them on some performance figures that looked impressive on paper (largely based on having that turbocharger), and they were not going to fact check this too closely. They made a few small changes to the specification (largely around changing out the weapons for 0.303 calibre rather than 0.3, swapping out the default 37 mm cannon for a 20 mm Hispano cannon), and the French also ordered some to a similar spec. When these aircraft finally arrived in Britain in the spring of 1941 (including those originally intended for the French), the Royal Air Force was not pleased. It was immediately apparent that the aircraft did not perform as advertised, particularly at altitude, and to add insult to injury, the layout of the guns made it difficult to service the engine, refuel, and rearm at the same time, something the RAF was anticipating needing to do. Only one RAF squadron ever operated the P-400 as a result, and the rest of the order was cancelled, those planes already produced being crated up and placed in storage. 

    These crated up aeroplanes had been shipped to the Pacific when a rather bizarre idea to try invading mainland Europe had been cancelled in June, and the 67th fighter squadron had made heroic efforts to get these aircraft assembled, flying, and getting the pilots familiar with them in a very short space of time. Rumours abound about what these aircraft may or may not have had; most sources seem to agree that the manuals were missing, or at the very least that documentation was limited; other sources claim that the P-400s were fitted for British oxygen systems, and were incompatible with the U.S. system, so the pilots were going into combat with no oxygen masks, but I have no way to confirm any of these claims. The basic point is that these were not ideal circumstances. 

    Usefulness of the land-based aircraft aside, with Fletcher’s carriers at sea, and the IJN bearing down on Guadalcanal, the stage was set for another carrier battle. Unfortunately this time the U.S. Navy did not have the benefit of knowing where the enemy was, and spent most of the 23rd steaming around southeast of Guadalcanal, sending out search aircraft who found little except a handful of Japanese submarines, indicating that there was something afoot in the area, but not precisely what was afoot. Enterprise, Saratoga,  and their escorts continued to steam northwards, pursing reports of the Ryujo somewhere north of the Solomon Islands, and although Saratoga launched a strike of several dive bombers, they failed to find the target and ended up having to land on Guadalcanal.

    On the morning of the 24th, after several fruitless searches, their luck finally turned; another patrol plane based on Guadalcanal made another sighting of Ryujo and her accompanying ships. In the afternoon aircraft from Enterprise finally made contact with Ryujo, as well as another force consisting of 2 carriers (we now know these to have been the Zuikaku  and Shokaku). Unfortunately these reports were somewhat scrambled as there was very poor radio discipline, and with everyone trying to transmit at once, it took several attempts to actually get the message across. As soon as it was, Enterprise and Saratoga began to prepare dive and torpedo bombers to hit both these targets, but those of the Enterprise simply waited on deck while Fletcher decided what to do with the garbled information he was receiving.

    Saratoga’s aircraft were more lucky and were free to go about their business. Sure enough, the dive and torpedo bombers found Ryujo and screamed down from the sky, putting at least 3 bombs on target and leaving the light carrier a burning wreck, to be picked at by land-based aircraft before she would finally slip beneath the waves.

    Back on Enterprise, time was to force Fletcher’s hand. At 16:32, Enterprise’s radar detected a large flight of aircraft to the northwest, at about 90 miles distance. These raiders then disappeared from the radar screen while the other ships in the task force quietly prayed they weren’t immediately going to be attacked. At 16:49, the raiders reappeared on the radar screen, and six minutes later the fighters covering the American carriers finally spotted the raid, at least 36 attack aircraft with numerous Zero fighters escorting. 

    Chaos now reigned as both carriers scrambled to clear their decks, launching fighters, followed by the strike aircraft previously prepared, all chatting on the radio, along with the fighters already in the air beginning combat with the Japanese force. By 1703, the last aircraft had cleared the deck of Enterprise, and to avoid attack she had wound herself up to 27 knots, manoeuvring wildly to avoid the imminent attack. 

    During the attack that followed, Enterprise was struck by 3 bombs, one near the no.3 elevator which penetrated several decks, before exploding in the chief petty officer’s mess. Several sailors were killed instantly, large holes were opened up, the hangar deck buckled, and a large fire was started on 2 deck. Another hit a large collection of anti-aircraft guns, causing a huge number of casualties and starting a vicious fire, and a third hit the flight deck on the starboard side, causing largely shock damage, all the way down to the waterline. Damage control efforts started immediately as fire crews hosed down the burning anti-aircraft gallery with foam, while still others battled to patch holes in the flight deck.

    Meanwhile, some of the Japanese aircraft had abandoned the attack on Enterprise and went after the battleship North Carolina. She was not only armoured to withstand 16 inch shell hits reasonably well, but also bristled with 5 inch and smaller anti-aircraft guns, and so ferocious was their fire that many incorrectly reported that the ship herself was ablaze. No hits were scored on North Carolina.

    The parties shoring up Enterprise’s flight deck at last succeeded in patching it up sufficiently, and at 1800 the wounded ship was even able to steam at 24 knots into the wind and collect some of her aircraft. This was brought to an abrupt halt a few minutes later; the crews desperately fighting the fires in the anti-aircraft battery had quite naturally attempted to dowse the flames with huge quantities of foam, but this had dripped down the decks and ended up in the steering room with the motors controlling the ship’s rudder, shorting them out and leaving Enterprise with no steering. Fortunately Saratoga was able to at least land the remaining aircraft while her sister fought for her life.

    Smug British historians may point out at this juncture that British aircraft carriers all had armoured flight decks rather than the wooden decks of American ones, and were (it is argued) much better ships by dint of this, perhaps better able to survive the sort of punishment meted out at the so-called Battle of the Eastern Solomons. This is an argument that still rages across the internet and indeed probably will still be being argued long into the future, so we are definitely not going to put it to bed now, but it is worth explaining why I think the Americans were actually correct, if for no other reason than it is an interesting tangent.

    From our privileged vantage point in the present day, it would seem that the British policy was correct. Indeed, all modern aircraft carriers from every country (currently including the British, French, Chinese, Russians, Indians, technically a few smaller nations, and the Americans themselves) have metal flight decks and many of these are to one degree or another armoured. We could also look at what happened later on and the very different experiences of British and American carriers coming under kamikaze attack, but neither 2025 era aircraft carriers nor kamikazes existed in 1942. 

    By 1942, the world was only just emerging from the inter-war era of the naval treaty. There are many interesting aspects of these treaties, but for now just know that the total tonnage of various types of ship (including aircraft carriers) was restricted. So to make up, say, an allowance of 100,000 tonnes of aircraft carriers, would it be better to have 5x 20,000 tonne ships, or just 3x 33,000 tonne ones? Almost everyone preferred having 5; such considerations are not valid today with no such limit to how big you can make the carrier, but at the time they did force some trade-offs.

    The heavy armoured flight decks of British carriers may have helped survivability, but the structure needed to support that made the hangars more cramped, and as a result they could not host anything like as many aircraft. For comparison, let us take HMS Ark Royal. In every dimension she was very similar to the USS Enterprise (often within a few feet), so you would imagine that the air groups would be similar, but no. Ark Royal could manage 60 aircraft (often putting to sea with fewer), whereas Enterprise could comfortably manage 90, and often carried more. 

    Even survivability is a somewhat questionable aspect; certainly the flight deck armour did absolutely nothing to stop submarine attacks, as the crews of Eagle, Ark Royal, and Courageous found out to their cost. Several British carriers took severe damage in the Mediterranean from German air activity, which only made them more vulnerable to submarines. The little 11,000 tonne Hermes also failed completely to withstand Japanese air attack, and we cannot forget that multiple battleships with even thicker deck armour were crippled and/or sunk by air attack.

    Aircraft, as we have seen, were rapidly becoming the defining weapon of naval combat, and being able to carry more of them was a definite advantage, their good offence probably just as great a defence as some additional armour. Indeed, having large numbers of effective aircraft may have saved Glorious from her fate in Norway (a topic for another day). This is normally where the discussion ends; the U.S. ships had better striking power, the British were a little tougher but lacked the punch. But why?

    One of the many reasons is to do with doctrine, that is, the way an armed service intends to fight. Between the wars, the U.S. Navy had been experimenting extensively with combat uses for aircraft carriers, and several exercises (known as “Fleet Problems”) had revealed how useful they could be, not to mention the (somewhat questionable but influential) work of figures like Billy Mitchell. Meanwhile, the Royal Navy had lost control of the aircraft on the flight decks; the RAF had actually absorbed the nascent Royal Naval Air Service in 1918, and the Royal Navy had only regained control of the renamed Fleet Air Arm in 1939. It is not surprising that little work had been done on using aircraft, and with the strong influence of the battleship lobby, coupled with the short time and money available, it is even less surprising that the doctrine they ended up with was unimaginative; Find, Fix, Strike. This meant that the role of the Fleet Air Arm was to find the enemy fleet, “fix” it in place by causing damage, and strike to make it weaker, while the battleships arrived and did the real fighting. In such a scenario, not many aircraft were needed, and it made sense to use the unneeded space to add some protection.

    Now, in the interests of time, we are going to leave this tangent into aircraft carrier design and return to the south west Pacific. Stubborn fires continued to burn aboard Enterprise as she fought to regain steering, as night at last fell, and a smaller group of Japanese ships (a mix of cruisers, destroyers and transports) snuck towards Guadalcanal, trying to put troops ashore, bombard the Marines, and put this whole business to bed. By the time the sun rose on the 25th, Enterprise had finally put out the fires of the previous day, and the Japanese carriers were nowhere to be seen; this new group of ships was bombed intensively by the Dauntless dive bombers of Guadalcanal, and somehow managed to get unlucky enough to get hit by a B-17 of all things. This group too was forced into a retreat back towards Rabaul.

    Back aboard Enterprise and Saratoga, while the dead were buried at sea, records were being compiled, and the after-action report was being compiled (one of the best sources on this particular battle). This was quite the task since the pilots and anti-aircraft gunners had claimed a total of 70 aircraft destroyed; even at the time they knew this could not possibly be true (remember they only detected 36 aircraft in the first place), so how had so many been claimed?

    Let us do a quick thought experiment. Put yourself in the cockpit of one of those Wildcat fighters; it is a noisy environment, your engine churning away ahead, the confusion of aeroplanes all around, both your own, and the enemy’s, visible above, below, to the side. Fully aware that a wrong move could spell your death, adrenaline surges through your veins, as G-forces tug at your circulation, almost making you black out one moment, and red out the next. A Zero dives down in front of you, briefly flashing into your sights, you pull the trigger, and your tracer zips towards the enemy plane. A few seconds later, it explodes. Surely this is your kill? Well, it may be true that you damaged it, but the killing blow could just as easily have come from one of your comrades, or from a burst of anti-aircraft fire, or perhaps even friendly fire from another Japanese aircraft, or more likely some combination of the above. So even without meaning to, it was somewhat inevitable that the same aircraft would be claimed multiple times; the Japanese archives reveal that the number shot down was not in fact 70, or even all 36, but 25. 

    Even this was narrowly a victory, despite the heavy damage to Enterprise. You see, while the Americans were able to recover the vast majority of their downed aircrew, the Japanese, fighting above the U.S. task force and the U.S. held waters around Guadalcanal, were unable to recover any. Aircrew take much time and effort to train (at least if you want them to be effective), far more so than the average sailor or soldier, so this in and of itself was a big loss. And of course, the light carrier Ryujo was also on the bottom, whereas Enterprise was still underway.

    Whatever the case, by the 25th August the few remaining Japanese troops on Guadalcanal were not reinforced. The 1st Marine Division remained ashore, a long way from Allied help but nevertheless still there having survived for 3 weeks with few supplies, no facilities, disease, heat, humidity, and a ferocious Japanese counterattack. The seas around the Solomons had already been the stage for two naval battles, and the skies reverberated daily with the sound of American and Japanese aircraft locked in mortal combat. Both sides were to take a breath, as the campaign to hold onto Guadalcanal continued, but it was clear that the Americans were going nowhere in a hurry, and that if the Japanese wanted to retake the island, they were going to have to spend a lot more lives. 

    A lesson one might take here (apart of course from all the various tangents) is that while in life we are not always fully prepared, or fully confident in taking a risk, we are often far more resilient than we first realise. We can take crushing losses and still achieve what we set out to achieve. 

    Another take home point is that, as Winston Churchill famously said “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts”. The Allies may have been successful on that day, but there was no guarantee this would continue; the 1st Marines were going to have to steel themselves for what may be out there in the Pacific waters, and, at the risk of spoiling the rest of the story, for putting up with the horrendous conditions for a far, far longer time than they could have expected. Thus we are leaving this, as things are always in your own life, in medias res, perhaps for the best.

    Finally, I think it is worth taking some time to reflect on the losses sustained. Casualties were relatively light on the ground, and in the air were by no means excessive (many of the crews bailed out and were recovered, as we have stated), but in the action on August 9th, I would like to pay tribute to the following:

    United States Ships:

    Quincy (CA-39)

    Commissioned 1936, 
    Built 1935 by the Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, Quincy, Massachusetts.
    Lost with 370 dead.

    Vincennes (CA-44)

    Commissioned 1937,
    Built 1935 by the Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, Quincy, Massachusetts.
    Lost with 322 dead.

    Astoria (CA-34)

    Commissioned 1934,
    Built 1933 by the Puget Sound Navy Yard, Bremerton, Washington.
    Lost with 219 dead.

    His Majesty’s Australian Ships:

    Canberra (D33)

    “Pro Rege, Lege et Grege” 
    Commissioned 1928,
    Built 1927 by John Brown & Company, Clydebank.
    Lost with 84 dead.

    We will add to this list as the story continues.

    Bibliography

    While this is by no means an academic piece and does not pretend to live up to those standards, there are some publications you may wish to explore if you want to know more.

    The Metal Fighting Ship in the Royal Navy by E.H.H Archibald – 1st Edition, 1971. This one was a brilliant charity shop find, if you want some of the technical details and development history of, well, metal ships in the RN, look no further.

    Carrier Operations in WWII – Volume II The Pacific Navies (Dec 1941 – Feb 1943) – 1st Edition, 1974. Another charity shop find, giving brief accounts of all the various battles. A bit limited if you want to study the Japanese side, but quite good for the Allies.

    U.S.S. Enterprise – Action of August 24, 1942, Including Air Attack on U.S.S. Enterprise; Report of (dated September 5, 1942). Alas, I have no physical copy, but you can read the whole thing online.

    The website of the U.S. Navy History & Heritage Command is of course superb, and well worth exploring for anything the U.S. Navy has been involved with in the past 250 years.

    There are of course a lot of less formal sources:

    Firstly, the excellent Greg’s Airplanes & Automobiles, who has done some extremely detailed work on World War 2 aircraft.

    No list of naval history YouTube channels would be complete without the incomparable Drachinifel – who has detailed accounts not only of Guadalcanal but of particular ships, technologies, personalities, pretty much you name it.

    Another brilliant channel is the Unauthorized History of the Pacific War – if you want to watch 2 historians and a former submarine commander discuss in fascinating detail the events in the pacific, this is definitely for you.

    There were a lot of different online sources (apart from Greg) around the P-400 Airacobra, see here, here, and here. I was not able to confirm these sources very well, so fingers crossed it came across as somewhat doubting in the above.

    Another podcast worth looking at is Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History, in particular the series “Supernova in the East” – a far more expansive look at the Pacific War, including the Japanese perspective, and a lot of the reasons why they were doing these things.

    March 9, 2025

  • When You Are in a Better Position Than You Think You Are – The Far East & Midway

    File:11 Squadron RAF Blenheim takeoff Ceylon WWII IWM CI 105.jpg
    11 Squadron at Colombo Racecourse (public domain)

    Mid-morning April 9th, 1942. On the hastily converted racecourse-cum-airfield in the middle of Colombo, Ceylon (modern-day Sri Lanka), the men of 11 squadron, RAF, paced around nervously, their flying kit somewhat warm for the sticky climate, not helped by the yellow Mae West life jackets around their upper bodies. Perhaps, some may have reflected, they would be needing them soon.

    The still-young day had been dramatic already; the fighter squadrons at the base had already been scrambled to intercept a Japanese raid, and all concerned can only too painfully have been aware of the presence of enemy aircraft carriers that the Royal Navy had, to date, completely failed to stop. The clock ticked.

    It is very tempting now to look back and see the Second World War as a foregone conclusion; the resources of the allied nations being far superior to those of the axis; and while this does have tremendous value for batting away conspiracy theorists on the 21st century internet, it does not give a sense of the feeling at the time. To give you that sense, let us consider what was happening to this point in that year, of that war.

    There were some reasons for optimism at the start of the year; the Germans had failed to take Moscow, and their armies had in fact nearly been destroyed at its gates. The flip side of course, was that they were still there and precious little progress had been made by the Red Army; the Luftwaffe seemed perfectly capable of supplying the few German troops who had been trapped and there was no prospect of direct help from the western allies.

    In the west again there were limited reasons for optimism. The entry of the United States into the war promised great industrial capacity, as well as scores of troops, tanks, aeroplanes, ships and all the other necessities of war. Unfortunately, it was going to be some time before those arrived, and there was the small matter of an overall allied strategy to piece together.

    British eyes are ever turned on the sea; as an island it is essential to have good sea lines of communication, and on this front things seemed to be going from bad to worse. In this respect, the USA entering the war had been a profound disadvantage; US waters were now fair game for U-Boats, and as if that was not bad enough, coastal cities had absolutely no intention of introducing a blackout, perfectly silhouetting merchant shipping at night. Targets were easy, so much so that the U-Boat commanders began calling it the “Second Happy Time” (the first was much earlier, before the Royal Navy had really got their act together); losses had shot up from 28 ships lost in December 1941, to 66 in January 1942, and the losses continued to mount; in March, 99 ships were lost.

    If you were an allied serviceman, this is likely your best view of Scharnhorst; the Office of Naval Intelligence card. (public domain) A fearsome ship, but should have been no challenge at all to the Home Fleet or even the RAF, had either really shown up

    And then in February, the German battleships Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, and the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen (of Bismarck-accompanying fame) had done something that should have been absolutely suicidal; slipping through the English channel into the North Sea; and survived. That the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force should have failed to do more than scratch the paint on the German ships was so incomprehensible that Winston Churchill had telephoned the Chief of the Imperial General Staff, Alan Brooke, and simply asked “WHY?!” before slamming the phone down. 

    These days most people remember Churchill as an adored wartime leader, but in these dark times, there were mutterings of discontent. Britain had been at war now for almost 3 years, and in that time, things had only seemed to get worse. It is natural that the buck stops at the top, especially for this kind of poor performance, and many of Churchill’s more optimistic pronouncements now seemed to be merely bluster; he had resoundingly won a vote of confidence in January, but worse was to come.

    For the RAF generally it had been a difficult time. Having narrowly survived the Battle of Britain, the RAF had failed to stop the nighttime blitz on British cities, and even in the daytime had struggled to make much impression on the Luftwaffe in France. Worse still, a new fighter, the Fw190, had appeared in the skies over Northern France and proved superior to any RAF fighter of the day; the attempts to up-engine the Spitfire would have to wait several more months to see service.

    Since the very start of the war, Bomber Command had been doing its best to make life difficult for Germany. It had very quickly become obvious that daylight raids by unescorted bombers was pure folly; total losses of every single aircraft on the raid were by no means unheard of, putting the lie to the pre-war assertion that “the bomber will always get through”. Nevertheless, the RAF had turned to night bombing, something they glamorised in films like Target for Tonight, and it had seemed initially that (according to the crews at least) things were going well.

    To test this assertion, aerial photographs were taken (involving great risk to pilots flying unarmed aircraft deep into Germany), and what they discovered was… very little. Most targets showed little damage, with a wide spread of bomb craters nowhere near anything important; some targets did not appear to have been hit at all. Analysis carried out for the Butt Report (yes really, no sniggering at the back) suggested that even among aircraft that reported attacking the target, only one in three got within five miles. This caused a great deal of squabbling among the top brass; Bomber Command badly needed to sort itself out before it could be effective.

    In the deserts of North Africa, there were better developments; by January 1942, the 8th army had pushed into Libya; but again, these were highly tempered; Allied air and naval forces on Malta had failed to cut off Axis supply lines from Italy to the front (and were in fact now coming under considerable attack themselves), and additional German forces were arriving under their soon-to-be-famous commander Erwin Rommel. Almost immediately they began to make ground, not helped by the distraction of a pro-German coup in Iraq (which 11 squadron had seen first hand, shortly before being transferred to the far east).

    Back on the home front, rationing was really beginning to bite; clothing shortages as pre-war stocks ran out had led to them being rationed on the 1st June 1941, and by March 1942, petrol for private motoring had been banned altogether. Coal had also started to be rationed, the Fuel and Lighting Order having come into force in January. Colombo was indeed a long way from home, but every single one of the men of 11 squadron would have known someone at home who would be just that little bit thinner, more poorly clothed, and colder than before.

    As the men arose that morning in the tropical humidity, gazing out upon their hastily converted airfield, they may have reflected that the situation they were now involved in showed no more signs of optimism than any of the other theatres; Pearl Harbour is well known, but the situation since was no bed of roses, even when it was known the Japanese were coming. In short succession, the bulk of what had been the Dutch East Indies (now mostly Indonesia) had fallen to the Japanese, causing the complete collapse of the ABDA (American, British, Dutch, Australian) command, making it the shortest-lived of all Allied joint commands for the entire war. A guerrilla campaign was still ongoing for the island of Timor, but the British were unable to offer assistance owing to their own problems. 

    What of the Royal Navy? Stretched thin by a global war with commitments in the Atlantic, Arctic, Mediterranean and now Pacific and Indian Oceans, it had simply not the resources to contend with the far less widely spread Imperial Japanese Navy. The IJN had a much better understanding of the use of aircraft (both from land bases and carriers), and they had used this very early on (the 10th December) to send the Battleship Prince of Wales and the Battlecruiser Repulse to the bottom long before either ship was in a position to do anything. Even in more conventional surface actions there was little the RN’s eastern fleet could do to stem the tide, and they were compelled to retreat from the area.

    On land, Malaya had fallen swiftly to Japanese forces, attacking what were under-equipped forces who, having been given the rather racist impression that the Japanese were a backward people, were now faced with an extremely aggressive, ruthless enemy who controlled the skies with machinery superior to their own. “Fortress” Singapore had clung on a little longer but despite attempts to reinforce it had fallen by the end of February, the single largest surrender in British Army history, and certainly a great embarrassment for a colonial power who had been just 4 months earlier the envy of the world. 

    Lt. General Percival surrendering to the Japanese at Singapore (public domain)

    Japanese forces had also stormed into Burma and cut the Burma road, denying the Allies a direct ground supply route to the Chinese Nationalists under Chiang Kai-shek. Not only was this a bitter blow to the only power that had been continuously fighting the Japanese before 1941 (and by far the largest land power opposing them), but it was an emotional blow to the fledgling United Nations as they struggled to coordinate a successful war.

    A quick note for the modern audience; it is tempting to view the Japanese takeover in these areas as one colonial power replacing another, and thus for the native population, a neutral affair. It is indeed true that the image of the British as superior to the locals had been comprehensively shattered, and it is also true that British rule was frequently violent and almost always compelled in some way. What is neglected in this modern view is the level of cruelty by the Japanese; soldiers committed wonton acts of violence as a matter of course, rather than exception, including the mutilation and murder of civilians, prisoners, and anyone else unlucky enough to cross paths with them. Once this initial phase was over, the locals had to contend with the rounding up and executing of the ethnic Chinese of the area, forced labour, taking of comfort women for repeated rape and the consequent hundreds of thousands of deaths in Malaya and Singapore alone. This pales in comparison with the scale of carnage wrought by the Japanese in China itself (curious readers should look up the Rape of Nanking and Unit 731 and be prepared for a shock to the system), but alas, that is a story for another day.

    11 squadron’s target that day must have seemed daunting; the aircraft carriers Akagi, Shokaku, Zuikaku, Soryu and Hiryu were all present. These 5 had all participated in the raid on Pearl Harbour and were a yet undefeated in battle, while their aviators had continued to inflict blows on startled allied defenders. They were protected by no fewer than 4 battleships and 11 cruisers, as well as numerous smaller craft. 

    Having arrived just a week before, the crews may not have had long to get acclimated to the local political situation, but India in 1942 was to say the least uneasy. The All India Forward Bloc had been founded just 3 years before, and although methods varied considerably (think Gandhi on the one end, and Bose on the other end, who was actively working with Japan and Germany to try to foment discontent). While the cause of Indian independence was a righteous one, for the time being it was difficult for the British to manage, and fight a world war, particularly. with millions of Indian troops serving around the world.

    Bristol Blenheim Mk.IV in flight (public domain) This is the type 11 squadron flew.

    Their own aircraft, the Bristol Blenheim, cannot have inspired complete confidence. First flying in the mid-1930s, at that time it was one of the fastest and most capable aircraft on the planet, able to evade enemy fighters simply by dint of its speed. However, such was the speed of aviation development that by the war’s outbreak, fighters had long since eclipsed the Blenheim’s performance, and the addition of defensive guns had only slowed it further; the resulting aircraft was dangerously vulnerable without a fighter escort (incidents of every single aircraft on a raid being destroyed were well-documented); and they were not going to get that escort on the 9th. 

    Nevertheless, the crews, now knowing where their target lay, climbed aboard their aircraft. Checks followed; first the undercarriage, then control movement, engine cowling positions, propeller pitch; the ground crews would give each engine a good prime, and then with magnetos switched correctly, the engines could at last be started, spluttering into life, making the bombers throb with nervous energy as they were run up. Oil pressures, air pressures, r.p.m.s and magnetos all checked, they taxied out to the runways, opened up the engines, and with the roar of 18 propellers, 9 Blenheims rose skywards and turned into the Bay of Bengal. Propeller pitches set to coarse, they cruised at 11,000 ft, unsure of what awaited them, as the clock ticked on past 10:00.

    But it was the Japanese turn to be surprised. It is difficult to know if any of the aircraft were spotted by the escorting ships, or indeed the combat air patrol of Zero fighters (there is some evidence they were spotted by Hiryu but the air raid warning was not passed on), but at 10:25, 11 squadron began their attack on the carriers. Bomb doors opened, aircraft held steady, bomb aimers squinted into bomb sights, straining to put the merchants of so much calamity out of action.  500 lb bombs hung, armed, in the bomb bays, any one of which could have caused serious damage, especially to the poorly armoured Japanese ships (in common with most US and Japanese carriers, the flight decks were made of little more than wood planking). Perhaps holding their breath, the bomb release buttons were jabbed, and each 500 pounder tumbled, spinning slightly as it fell earthward. 

    Alas, it would be in vain. Every single one of the bombs dropped missed every single one of the Japanese carriers; worse still, now alerted of the allied air threat, fighters would be vectored in to swot away the British attempt. 11 squadron would lose 4 of the 9 Blenheims in quick succession, the crews having little chance of rescue even if they escaped their burning aeroplanes. To add insult to injury, aircraft returning from a Japanese raid elsewhere would claim another one of the returning Blenheims, a total loss rate of just over 55% for no effect. Nor would the Fleet Air Arm have any more luck; Admiral Somerville’s task force, despite being equipped with up-to-date radar and tactics that likely would have worked, were never in a position to do any harm to the Japanese Kido Butai. Even more embarrassingly, they felt obliged to retreat across the Indian Ocean to the east coast of Africa; outside Burma and India, Britain’s war in the far east was over. 


    Meanwhile, far to the east, across the Pacific in Hawaii, the smoke was beginning to clear from the attack on Pearl Harbour. Hoses played across the quaysides, pumps worked frantically, and coffer dams were being installed to allow work on the hulls of the damaged battleships. Tragically, the deaths had continued for some while after December 7th; the heart-breaking discovery had been made aboard West Virginia that 3 sailors had survived, and marked a calendar, for 16 days following the attack, with no way to escape; but on the whole the mood was on the up, particularly as the U.S. Navy found the base still usable (indeed, dry dock no.3 was completed ahead of schedule in 1942 and began to service destroyers and the like).

    The U.S. situation in early 1942 was uncharacteristic for those familiar with modern-day America. In 1940, far from being the military juggernaut she is today, the US had only half a million service personnel across all services. To put that in perspective, Britain at the time had called up a total strength of 1,812,600 across its services, and was only one of two great powers fighting the axis. Hurrying to fill the ranks with the Selective Training and Service Act in 1940, men began to be drafted, but even on the eve of war, she would only scrape together 1,801,101. The vast majority of the now-famous equipment we think of as quintessential to their war effort (the M1 Garand rifle, the M4 Sherman tank, the P51 Mustang and so on) was not in widespread use or simply did not yet exist.

    It is widely known that the attack on Pearl Harbour was an enormous shock (particularly as the average view of the Japanese was just as wide of the mark as the British), but what is less widely appreciated in Britain at least is the campaign in the Philippines. General Douglas MacArthur and his Philippine Army (of which he rather dubiously appointed himself field marshall) had been unable to stem the tide of Japanese invasion, and been forced to retreat to the Bataan peninsula, from which they would fight bravely, promised support that could not possibly arrive. While MacArthur was evacuated to Australia, 75,000 U.S. and Filipino soldiers surrendered, experiencing all the horrors (and more) of Japanese occupation on a death march to captivity.

    Closer to home, under a wave of (on the whole completely unfounded) suspicion, the president signed Executive Order 9066, which ordered the expulsion of “any and all persons” who were felt to be a risk, from all areas of military importance. On the face of it, that may not sound too bad; the only problem was that the definition of an “area of military importance” had been left open to interpretation by the military, who swiftly decided that the entire west coast was an area of military importance, and that the “any and all persons” really just meant Japanese Americans. Thus are the dangers of being seen to be doing something.

    There was as yet nowhere that U.S. ground forces were fighting German ground forces, and only a slow trickle of troops and aircraft into the UK (indeed, the later famous 8th air force would not be in a position to do any strategic bombing until the following year), nor had U.S. naval forces had any success in preventing the U-Boat’s Second Happy Time off the east coast. Moods were mixed as to what to do; it must be borne in mind that until December 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt had been maintaining his promise that the United States would not be involved in what was then seen as a European war; it is not surprising that some saw little point in continuing the war. Most wanted to continue, but despaired of the inability of the U.S. to make a direct impact; we might see FDR as a great wartime leader now, but this mood was not yet prevalent. In his “fireside chats” on the radio, the president attempted to inspire confidence, and spoke of the importance of maintaining supply routes across the seas (one of the few ways the U.S. could actually help her allies); in retrospect he was entirely right, but in a nation eager to see progress this seemed frustratingly feeble. 

    What was desperately needed was a morale boost, a way of showing at home and abroad that the Americans were still in this fight. This need was answered by none other than Jimmy Doolittle, a man already famous for his aviation feats before the war (including, among other things, winning the Schneider, Bendix, and Thompson air races). He supposed that, with some equipment removed, the Army Air Force’s medium bombers could take off from the decks of aircraft carriers, bomb Japan and make it to friendly airfields in China, and he had the wherewithal and ability not only to persuade the Navy to support him, but to carry this raid out, himself actually flying the lead bomber. This is a fascinating story in its own right that rewards investigation, but for now just note that such was the brutality of the Japanese, and their shock that this should have been attempted, that they engaged in a months’ long campaign in China to capture the raiders; the Chinese leadership estimated that this may have cost as many as 250,000 Chinese casualties. 

    B25 Bomber taking off from USS Hornet to take part in the Doolittle Raid. (public domain)

    Despite this success (and it may not have been widely appreciated at this stage) but it was a fact that the Imperial Japanese Navy outnumbered the U.S. Navy in the Pacific, at least in terms of aircraft carriers. The numbers were further depleted as resources had to be devoted to the Atlantic, and more esoteric duties like ferrying aircraft to Malta and other places. Until this deficit of ships was put right, it was not possible to protect troops from Japanese aircraft, and thus, there could be little thought of attacking anywhere. 

    But how to do this? May had seen the inconclusive Battle of the Coral Sea. True, in retrospect, they had prevented a landing at Port Moresby on New Guinea, but trading the fleet carrier Lexington and significant damage to the Yorktown for sinking just one light carrier (Shokaku) and damaging another, was not sustainable. The battle had also (along with the efforts of Edward “Butch” O’Hare, the U.S. Navy’s first fighter ace, and the man after whom Chicago’s airport is named) conclusively proved Japanese aircraft were not invincible, but there seemed to be no prospect of destroying the Kido Butai anywhere soon.

    Still, they could but try. U.S. intelligence had failed to predict the attack on Pearl Harbour (in hindsight this owed more to Japanese careful planning than any American incompetence), and had since been under considerable pressure to get results. To this end, they had broken elements of Japanese code, and were able to deduce that an attack was planned on “AF”; the trouble was that they did not know for certain what “AF” referred to. There was some inkling that the Japanese were looking to extend their perimeter into the Pacific, and by a process of elimination, the tiny (but appropriately named) island of Midway seemed likely. 

    Fortunately the U.S. had an airfield on Midway island, a radio transmitter and an undersea telegraph cable. The latter two they decided to use for a clever ruse; it was known that the Japanese would intercept and (where they could) read radio messages; so the American codebreakers sent a message to the garrison on Midway, and asked them to send an uncoded radio message declaring that their water plant had broken down. Within a day, the Japanese message “AF is short of water” was decoded; AF was indeed Midway.

    There was precious little time; the heavily damaged Yorktown was heroically put back to sea in just 72 hours, with dock workers still aboard. The carriers Enterprise and Hornet sortied also. Aircraft were rushed to the island, from the U.S. Navy, Marines, and Army Air Force, including (but not limited to) no less than 31 Catalina flying boats, and 17 Flying Fortresses. As May turned to June, the stage was set.

    A slightly later photograph of a Catalina flying boat (public domain). An odd-looking but very effective aeroplane.

    The Catalina was a strange-looking aircraft, even by flying boat standards; the hull was slung some distance below its one huge wing, with the two engines on top. It had two huge blisters aft (one per side) which could be used either as mounts for machine guns, or be peeled back to pick up stranded persons from the water, or for clear observation downwards while in flight. Known to the U.S. Navy as the PBY, it was one of many ugly but useful aircraft supplied by the Consolidated Aircraft Corporation, and while it was neither fast nor glamorous it did have an excellent endurance. This ability to stay in the air for long periods of time would make it ideal for keeping watch, and perhaps, as the PBYs bobbed up and down in the swell, the pilots at Midway might have said a little prayer that they would catch the enemy first.

    Ensign Jack Reid was well-acquainted with the strangeness of the Catalina as he prepared to take his (along with his crew) on yet another reconnaissance sortie from Midway island, early on the morning of the 3rd June. After checking over the pale blue PBY, they fired up the two Pratt & Whitney engines, and gently taxied on the water, before Reid eased the throttles (which dangled from the ceiling of the cockpit in another example of the Catalina’s strangeness) forward, and the lumbering flying boat punched over the surface of the water, up onto the very surface, and at last with a little effort on the controls became airborne.

    Many hours later, at around 0900, many hundreds of miles to the southwest of Midway, at last they saw what they thought they were looking for; columns of ships flying the “meatball” flag of the IJN. Radioing back at once, Midway, and by extension the whole U.S. military, now knew that the attack was real; on the airfield, the crews of 9 Flying Fortresses scrambled into their kit, were briefed, checked their aircraft, and then, to the roar of 36 Wright Cyclone engines, thundered off to the west to deal what was hoped to be the killer blow.

    The Flying Fortress is a famous aircraft, and for good reason; ever since its first flight in the late 1930s, it has never ceased to impress, festooned with .50 calibre machine guns, with an impressive (for the 1930s) bomb load, and a shape made iconic not just by allied propaganda at the time, but countless movies, TV shows, books, museums and much else since. It is well remembered that later in the war over Germany the B17 would develop a reputation as a superb daylight bomber, the ultimate US counterpart to the British Lancaster in the round the clock bombing campaign, and whether that reputation is deserved or not, the aircraft has no shortage of defenders online. 

    Unfortunately, for the task they were being sent to do on that June day, in the middle of the Pacific ocean, the B17 was a perfectly useless tool. It is true that the superb range of the aeroplane did get them over the target 3 hours after they had taken off (remember that powered flight at all, for any duration, had only been invented 39 years prior), and that the aircraft stood up quite well to the Japanese anti-aircraft fire, trying to hit moving ships from an aircraft flying tens of thousands of feet up in the air at a few hundred miles per hour, while being shot at, with varying winds, and no way to guide the bombs, was almost impossible. The B17 crews optimistically claimed to have scored 4 bomb hits, but in reality, nothing but near misses had been scored. It is possible that they mistook the splashes of bombs hitting the water near ships as hits, and as high up as they were, it may have been indistinguishable, especially while cold, frightened and tired from hours of flying.

    There was another nasty surprise; sitting behind their near-frozen 0.50 calibre Brownings, straining at every patch of blue sky for that dot of an enemy fighter, the Fortresses’ gunners were to have an easier ride than they anticipated. No Japanese aircraft showed. Perhaps they were just relieved to make it out of the area alive, but I suspect this may have given them some unease; where were these carrier aircraft they had been warned about? If not here, where? 

    Still, with the aircraft returning from the raid late on the 3rd June, the U.S. could not have considered the battle to be going badly. They had detected Japanese ships at long range and, if their crews were to be believed, had already scored some damage on them; to seal the deal, as dusk fell, several more PBYs were prepared, this time fitted with torpedoes. At night, their slow pace would not matter nearly so much, and so armed, the PBYs had some real teeth, as they bumped off the water and soared westwards; the small hours of the morning would see them claim first confirmed blood, with a Japanese oil tanker taking a torpedo hit at 0100. 

    As the sun rose over the shimmering, salty blue of the Pacific, on the 4th June, the optimistic mood was shattered by a cry from the radar operators; a large Japanese raid was rapidly incoming. Pilots and ground crews ran to aircraft, smoke pouring from exhausts as cold engines were turned over rapidly and sputtered into life, and almost at random a collection of heavy and medium bombers, interspersed with defensive fighters, tore into the air.

    The cute-but-useless Brewster Buffalo – not destined for greatness at Midway either (public domain)

    The small fighter force, consisting of a mixture of F4F Wildcats and F2A Buffalos (the latter being a much-maligned, obsolete type that was only left in the theatre because of racist underestimation of the Japanese and only ever saw success in Finland of all places), must have swallowed hard at what they were being asked to do; the Japanese raid numbered over 100 aircraft, and their experienced pilots would despatch no fewer than 13 of the hapless Buffalos. Nevertheless, as the raid plunged toward Midway, they encountered fierce resistance from ground anti-aircraft fire; the thunder of shells turned skywards, crews remaining at their posts even as bombs rained down from dive bombers, had some effect. While losses in the air had been heavy, and casualties on the ground not exactly light, they had achieved their aim; by the time the last Japanese raider left, Midway’s defences were still largely intact.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. bombers discovered to their horror why they had not encountered any enemy aircraft the day before; they hadn’t been attacking the Japanese carrier force at all, but merely the transports for the land forces. Going up against the Kido Butai was an entirely different matter, and despite the heroics of a number of pilots closing to make close-range torpedo strikes on the carriers, no significant damage was done, and more brave pilots and precious aircraft were lost. Not long later, the Japanese were able to recover their raiding force and begin the process of rearming and refuelling for another crack at Midway. The defenders braced for another crushing blow, as had befallen Wake, the Philippines, Malaya, and everywhere else the seemingly-invincible Japanese had touched. 

    Take a wild guess which ship this is… (public domain)

    Far to the north, the U.S. Navy’s carriers prepared to have their go. This was always going to be something of a gamble (something admirals Fletcher and Spruance knew very well), with the range somewhat extreme, only a rough idea where the enemy actually was and knowing just how effective Japanese aircraft (particular their “Zero” fighters) could be. Nevertheless, they had at this moment the advantage of surprise, and they knew that not doing anything was simply not an option; keeping the Japanese busy with attacks would at the very least stop them launching further attacks on Midway.

    Warming up on the sun-drenched flight deck of Hornet were the TBD Devastator Torpedo bombers of squadron VT-8. The Devastato carried a single torpedo along its centreline, and was peculiar in having corrugated metal construction, somewhat spoiling its otherwise graceful lines. In the late 1930s it had been an impressive leap forward in capability for the U.S. Navy, featuring retractable landing gear and having considerably lower drag than the biplanes typical of the time. While that was already a fair distance in the past, and the Devastator had yet to, ahem, devastate, with the props turning and the torpedoes armed, it was time for the rubber to hit the road.

    VT-8’s task would be to go in first, trying to disrupt or sink Japanese carriers, and almost immediately it began to go wrong. Unlike the well-practiced Japanese, the Americans struggled to co-ordinate their launches anything like so well with the short notice they had. Nor did American pilots feel the need to stick rigidly to orders, even when told explicitly where they should fly to best encounter the enemy; as a result the Navy’s raid can best be described as haphazard. Some fighters even overestimated their range and were forced to ditch in the ocean when they ran out of fuel.

    Fortunately, VT-8 did manage to make contact with the Japanese carriers; Akagi, Hiryu, Kaga, and Soryu. This was very good news… for a minute or so. As they closed to make their torpedo runs, the slow Devastators came under withering anti-aircraft fire, and were then jumped by the Zero fighters of the Kido Butai; by the end of the engagement, all 15 TBDs were shot down, and as each torpedo sliced its way through the water, its path failed to meet a single Japanese ship. VT-8 had been completely destroyed. Only one of its men would ever get to see the United States again. While Enterprise and Yorktown’s torpedo squadrons would also try, by 1000, the skies above the Kido Butai were clear once again.

    SBD Dauntless Dive Bomber (public domain). Note the “swiss cheese” dive flaps

    But this is not where the story ends. Also included in the air groups of the U.S. carriers, flying at a much higher altitude, and much further behind the ill-fated VT-8, were SBD Dauntless dive bombers. Literally out of a clear blue sky, at 1025, (and more by accident than design) the dive bombers of Yorktown, Enterprise and Hornet all converged above the Japanese force, wheeling over into near vertical dives, their “swiss cheese” air brakes the only thing between them and certain doom. Inside the cockpit, pilots’ eyes strain through bombsights as the altimeter wheels downwards, the maneuvering carriers making less than ideal targets. As low as they dare, they hit the bomb release button on the stick and pull back for dear life, the blood rushing to their feet as their minds struggled to maintain consciousness against the G force, the Dauntless’ screaming along at near-wavetop height.

    Only this time, the immense physical strain is not in vain. Multiple 1000 lb bombs race earthward; 3 each strike Kaga and Soryu and detonate; with both carriers full of flammable ordinance and aviation fuel, they are soon ablaze from stem to stern. One of the pilots of the Dauntlesses’  (appropriately named Richard Best) notices they are overfocusing on too few targets mid-dive, and leads a small number to attack Akagi; his 1,000 lb bomb whistles in, penetrates the thin wooden flight deck, and detonates inside Akagi’s hanger among the refuelling, rearming aircraft, causing a chain reaction of secondary explosions and fires. Before long, Akagi too is gutted by fire. In the space of scarcely 5 minutes, the Japanese have been smashed.


    Postscript; 

    Over the course of the following 24 hours, in a series of actions, the Americans will essentially lose the Yorktown but sink the Hiryu. By the end of the 5th June, every single one of the Japanese carriers was sunk, and the tide had been irrevocably turned in the Pacific (a fact which would be bloodily underlined in the struggle for Guadalcanal some months later). 

    Why do I write all this? Before any editing, this article is well over 5500 words long so far, by far the longest I have written here. It is not merely because it is an interesting story, not merely because it has a great pay-off at the end, a real triumph in the face of adversity, not because I am a bit too fond of military naval kit (these days I have a bit of a vested interest in that, as some of you will know). 

    No, the reason I have told you this story, dear reader, is that despite the very large amount of bad news in this story (it is pretty bleak for the first 5500 or so words with only the odd hint of optimism), in truth, as we know now, the Allies actually held all the cards. They had strengths they were yet to realise, and their enemies were far more stricken with weakness than they had any reason to believe. 

    For Nazi Germany, the clock was very much ticking. As oil reserves ran dry, the gamble of Operation Blue (which you may not have heard of) would be launched, to try to secure oil fields in the caucasus, ending in the catastrophic Battle of Stalingrad (which you will have heard of). Their failure in 1940 to knock Britain out of the war, and their failure in 1942 to knock the British out of Egypt or the Soviets out of Stalingrad would spell their ultimate doom. 

    German industry, the military, and government were beset by Nazi bureaucracy and infighting, and all three were less efficient than their Allied counterparts. Before long, as their cities were pounded to rubble both day and night, even using slave labour from all over the continent, they would fail to produce anything like what was needed to defend what they had taken. 

    So-called “brilliant” German generals would prove in 1942 that when they fought an enemy as prepared as they were, they held no aces, as Stalingrad and El Alamein would prove. In the Atlantic, Dönitz’s U-Boats would also prove to be defeatable, the “uncrackable” Enigma actually decryptable, and by the end of the war 30,000 out of the 40,000 U-Boat crew who served would be not just casualties, but dead. There would be rationing in Britain; but no starvation. It would take time; but Overlord would go ahead. 

    The embarrassing “channel dash” was also a victory for the British in the long run; by moving the Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, and Prinz Eugen back to Germany, apart from the occasional sortie against the arctic convoys or into the Baltic, they were now no threat to anyone. Scharnhorst would not even survive 1943, Gneisenau was so badly damaged the German admiralty decided to rebuild her, before Hitler decided this was a waste of time and most of her weapons were dispersed, and Prinz Eugen spent most of her time fighting no-one in the Baltic, before being taken as a prize by the USA at the end of the war and subsequently nuked (yes really, a story for another day).

    Japan for her part had taken huge resources in her campaigns, but all of it had to be transported either on heavily disputed overland routes or by sea, a sea which would become increasingly unfriendly to Japanese traffic. The Japanese would not be able to turn this material wealth into enough new ships, aircraft, tanks, or anything else to regain the initiative in the Pacific, or even be able to supply their existing troops properly; while Japanese troops starved on Guadalcanal, their American counterparts were eating Christmas dinner, and the U.S. Navy served ice cream. In 1944, a British Pacific fleet (one with much better aircraft and tactics) would even re-appear.

    Even some of Japan’s apparent strengths were illusory. Had the British held on a little longer in Singapore, they might have been faced with a Japanese army that had simply run out of supplies; in the story above, they also made mistake after mistake behind the scenes, leading to them failing to spot the U.S. fleet in time at Midway, or react quickly enough once they did. 


    Without doubt their biggest mistake of all was that their ships lacked radar. Whereas the Americans and British were able to spot incoming raids and deal with them as they happened, in any visibility, the Japanese had to get lucky to spot planes using nothing but the mk1 eyeball, perhaps with the aid of binoculars. On every occasion, whether it be the British Blenheims, the Fortresses, or the ungainly PBYs, it was only dumb luck that allowed them to survive. And they only had to get unlucky once.

    Neither was the sacrifice of VT-8 a complete waste; by forcing the Japanese to react to this attack, just as Spruance and Fletcher had hoped, their fighters had to burn fuel, which meant that by the time the dive bombers arrived, they were back on board the Japanese carriers and no threat to anyone. 

    America was already beginning to flex her engineering muscle. The obsolete Brewster Buffalo was withdrawn, and in 1943 they and the Wildcats would be replaced with the superb F6F Hellcat and F4U Corsair. Even as VT-8’s Devastators were being hammered out of the sky, the far better (and very appropriately named) Grumman Avenger was already rolling off the production lines. Future carrier battles would be nothing like so evenly matched; one even to this day is still called the “Great Marianas Turkey Shoot”. 

    As a manufacturing power the US would be utterly dominant in the war ahead, producing 192,000 aircraft (more than all the axis powers put together, despite being in the war for only 4 years), and adding to the 112,100 Soviet and 92,600 British. And that’s just aircraft, we haven’t got to the really impressive bit yet; over the course of the war, the shipyards of the USA would churn out no fewer than 155 aircraft carriers. Granted, most of these were of smaller escort types, but these yards were also busy building 2,710 “Liberty” cargo ships (the fastest of which went from keel laying to launch in just 4 and a half days), adding up to a total (including all other construction) of 5,500 ships.

    The list just goes on, and on, and on, and on; it really is true that Victory in both Europe and the Pacific was a case of when, not if. Doubtless in your own life it sometimes seems that all around is bad, that the news will simply never get better. Have another think; things may not be as bleak as they seem, perhaps you just need one victory to turn that tide; at the very least you now have perhaps history’s greatest example.


    Post-postscript

    If you are interested in the war in the pacific, I really must recommend the work of Jon Parshall; books, presentations, the lot. As well as being a well-respected historian he is also reasonably entertaining and has a superb presentation on 1942 which I highly recommend.

    There is a superb amount of information available on the Imperial War Museum website, particularly on home front matters such as rationing, and a surprising number of fabulous aircraft manuals available for free online (see here, here, and here for example, but pretty much google your favourite ww2 aeroplane and the manual will likely be somewhere).

    December 24, 2024

  • The Great Train Reverse-Snobbery


    2023 DISCLAIMER: The following article was written in June of 2020 but never published for fear of touching a (sort of) controversial topic in a (very) controversial time. While some of the specifics have changed, and certain claims I may shy away from now, the general thrust of the article is still valuable and you may find it interesting.

    (original) DISCLAIMER: This one is very public transport heavy, and might bore the pants off you if you have little interest in the topic. I wrote it mainly to make a point for other aficionados of transport, but for general consumption, it is a little less than ideal. There, please do read on, but consider yourself warned.


    Dear reader,

    It has been some time (in fact just over a year) since I posted anything on this worthy if neglected little blog. I offer no excuses for this rather sorry state of affairs, but I would ask you, dear reader, to bear in mind that life can get in the way.

    Now, this article concerns public transport, which is hardly surprising if you have been around here a while. However, if you have been paying attention to the United Kingdom or indeed the world recently, you may have noticed that the use of public transport has been discouraged. You all know why, and frankly I cannot be bothered to discuss it here.


    New Trains; Basic Problems

    If you have travelled on (so-called) LNER (no relation whatsoever to the actual London & North Eastern Railway, which was wound up in 1947) or (so-called) GWR (no relation whatsoever to the actual Great Western Railway, which was also wound up in 1947), you have probably noticed a change in trains.

    Furnished by the Intercity Express Program, these operators have taken delivery of brand-new trains supplied by Hitachi. The majority of these trains are bi-modes, meaning they can run on diesel or electric power, and they represent a sizeable investment, being designed to last for the next 30 years.

    This sounds like a good thing, but sadly these trains have fallen a bit short of the mark. Apart from the front, the exteriors are a bit… workmanlike. There are, for example, large gaps between coaches where various cables are strung, which is not only a bit ugly but also potentially dangerous (Network Rail pointed out that in theory, some vagabond could climb up them and access the train roof, leading to a lot of faffing around trying to find a solution). I suppose these gaps might also add drag, but I’m no aerodynamicist.

    Another questionable aesthetic choice is having doors which are set a few inches back from the bodyside of the train, rather than being flush (that is, in line with the bodyside) on the older trains. Again, I do ponder how good that is for aerodynamics, but I can understand this as an engineering choice; all the door has to do is slide to one side or the other, rather than having to push outwards and then slide. Complexity, as they say, is the enemy of reliability, but in the context of some of the other design choices, this one is slightly baffling. (I might also mention the lack of rain strips to keep the doors free of dripping rain, but this problem may now have been solved since).

    All the above said, it’s inside the trains where things start to fall apart (thankfully not literally, they’re actually pretty well put together).

    Inside one GWR example I had the dubious pleasure of travelling on, I was first presented with a toilet, which, having not sensibly planned the trip, I was in need of. Most normal (non disabled) toilets on trains feature a normal push door to go in, that springs shut just in case. Not so here, where the door slides aside on runners. It is still spring loaded, but I do have to question why this design was adopted; in theory it saves space from the normal door, but in practice most people shut the door before using the loo (even if they don’t it springs shut). The extra complexity of having runners that chewing gum and other detritus can get stuck in just doesn’t seem worth it to me. Still, the toilet worked fine and, unlike a lot of trains, washing and drying my hands was a doddle.

    Moving into the passenger saloon, I noticed that on both the LNER and GWR examples, the interior is very bright (goodness knows what the harsh LEDs are like at night, but they’re fine in the day), and legroom is good. Unfortunately, that’s where the good points end. Both examples have a rather cheap-looking bright green dot matrix screen for destinations. LNER’s trains have a garish bright red strip above the windows, and GWR’s have a garish green one instead. Both look very cheap and naff.

    The seats are famously uncomfortable. Having travelled on both the LNER and GWR examples, I can confirm both are bone-breakingly hard, and bolt upright. Seat padding has been kept to a bare minimum. Hitachi claim they have been “ergonomically designed” but for whom I am unsure; being an average height man of average build, if they don’t feel comfortable to me, I doubt they’re going to work for most people.

    I mentioned earlier that simplified doors seemed bizarre, given some other design choices. Apart from the toilet doors, this one really rubs me (and many of the traincrew) up the wrong way. There is a reservation system which has both a light (red, green or orange depending on potential occupancy) but also an LCD screen showing where seats are reserved from and to. Quite apart from the fact that the light is redundant because of the screen, this fails on numerous occasions; many GWR examples I observed going around with tickets in the back of the seats, like the old trains did.

    Why, if the aim was simple and reliable, was such a reservation system fitted? If they were desperate to have an electronic system, Cross Country’s “Voyager” trains have been going around for nearly 20 years with one that seems to work reliably, and LNER had just invested in an e-ink based system on their old trains. Besides, if reliability was key, why not just stick to the old system that the traincrew are already having to switch back to? A ticket, after all, doesn’t have any electronics to go wrong. The mind boggles.

    That’s standard class, but first class, I’m sorry to report , is no better. Both GWR and LNER (in their case thanks to the ill-fated Virgin Trains East Coast) had refurbished old trains with very nicely done first class sections. Such sections included leather seats, generous padding, beautiful carpets, curtains, window views from all seats, among other delights. The new trains have none of that. 

    I have been told that the new first class seats are designed to be more supportive, and get more comfortable as the journey progresses. I would humbly submit that this is a cop-out answer; a first class seat should be comfortable from the moment one sits down to the moment one alights at their destination, even if that’s only a short distance away.


    For Comparison…

    So, why am I telling you all this? Why, I hear you cry, are you complaining about new trains? Well, it’s because of all the ways these new trains have been spun to look like the best thing since sliced bread (or colour television, depending on your preferred analogy). I have been reminded time and again of Hitachi’s pedigree in Japan, and of the fantastic electrical efficiency of the various systems, and of the excellent availability rate, and of the operational advantages of splitting and joining trains.

    Lo, you cry, that’s all good stuff right? Yes. But passengers do not ride on pedigree, or electrical efficiency, or availability rates, or operational advantages. They ride on seats on trains. All these small (and not so small) niggles serve to remind the passenger that they are, after all, a number on a DfT spreadsheet. The attention to detail in the passenger experience has been sorely lacking, as I have demonstrated, especially considering the changes needed are not huge. Comfortable seats, until recently, were not too much to ask.

    One of course could say, ah, well, you said first class was rubbish, so maybe just get rid of it? The argument often goes that since so few actually use first, it should be dispensed with. I think this argument is, frankly, total bollocks.

    To explain why I think this, we have to look at car manufacturers. For the sake of example, let us pick Audi. Most cars that Audi sells will be fairly ordinary hatchbacks, saloons and SUVs. However, Audi also makes the R8, a supercar that is both extremely fast and luxurious. A very small percentage of Audi’s customers buy R8s, but they still make them. Why? Because it’s aspirational; one day, if you worked extremely hard and got very lucky, you might be able to own an R8. For now though, you’ll settle for an A3.

    The same is true of airlines; you might not be able to afford to fly first on a top airline, but you know that it is a fantastic experience, and you’ll get a small slice of that in economy.

    And the same really ought to be true of trains; it certainly has been at certain points in the past, but the idea that first class should be desirable seems to have fallen out of fashion. Instead it seems to be considered an extra that is thrown in, to spend as little money as possible on, because (the thinking goes) people only pay so they get a seat and the rest is frivolous. Not so, as we have seen.

    Ah yes, I hear you say, but that’s all very well for airlines and car manufacturers, but it won’t possibly work in boring old public transport like buses and trains. But the thing is, it is working for the former.

    Let me introduce you to the No. 36 bus, operating between Ripon and Leeds, in West Yorkshire. The list of high spec features on the 14 buses operating this service is mind boggling. Leather seats come as standard; but not just any. On the lower deck, one will find normal bus seats, but in quilted leather (yes, quilted) with plenty of padding. 4G WiFi is standard, as are USB charging points and wood-effect floors, as well as a crisp, glass-framed staircase. The rear seats even have tables.

    Upstairs, one will find full leather coach seats, lavishly padded and placed in a 2+1 configuration for extra space. To top that, the ceiling has glass panels to allow extra light during the day, and a view of the stars at night. All of this is wrapped in slick branding, and in fact the whole design was coordinated with transport design firm Best Impressions.

    The price for all this? For all 14 vehicles, £3.3 million. This sounds high, but per vehicle this works out at just under £236,000. Compare with the cost per vehicle of the Intercity Express trains mentioned earlier, which cost between £2.4 – £2.8 million per carriage. Obviously, the engineering needed is far more complex for a fast train than a bus, but the point is, these kinds of features do not have to be that expensive, in the grand scheme of things.

    In the bus industry, these ideas are far from niche; in Birmingham, National Express West Midlands have implemented a large number of “Platinum” routes, with buses at a much higher spec (Wi-Fi, charge points, leather headrests, comfier seats, more space, better floors, a well coordinated identity throughout, and so on and so forth). In fact, all the major bus operators either have premium brands or have made significant improvements.

    Ah well, you say, but that’s still a different industry. And besides, don’t railways have different safety standards? Quite aside from the fact that train collisions are far less common, these safety standards have not prevented operators in the past from coming up with fantastic interior design. Or, indeed, refitting existing trains.

    I will reference here the rather ill-fated (for numerous reasons, but not this one) Virgin Trains East Coast. Despite knowing their trains were going to be replaced in just a handful of years, VTEC decided to spend £21 million refurbishing and overhauling every single carriage in their fleet, in what they called “Project 21“. £21 million sounds like a lot, but this had to stretch over 401 coaches; this means that per carriage, they were only spending on average just under £53,000, cheaper still than the No. 36 bus (just a quarter of the price, in fact).

    For this money, they managed to afford new carpets throughout, new first and standard class seats (first class seats wide, leather clad and heavily padded, standard in cloth, but still with a good deal of padding). New table tops were also added, along with repainted toilet fittings, new artwork, new finishes in multiple areas, and improved toilet doors. Outside, the striking new VTEC livery (designed by Sam Jessup, at the time working for the same Best Impressions we mentioned earlier) was applied quickly using a vinyl wrap.  The overall effect was a dramatic update in comfort and general appearance, a much more professional impression than is gained with the newer trains.


    Conclusion

    And now, many, many words in, I shall come to my point. I’m not the first to observe this, but many in the industry and more widely feel that any money not spent on “making the trains run on time” is wasted, and sneer at those who suggest any other course of action. It is true that the basic product of the railway is punctual travel, but there are many limiting factors, and throwing more money at the problem does not appear to be working. I hope it’s also clear that in the grand scheme of things, making passenger experience better does not have to be expensive.

    And, while I did say I would not touch on Covid 19, I will say this. Before this crisis, there was great concern about the capacity of railways; trying to squeeze yet more people onto limited trains. In all this excitement, people began to be viewed increasingly as a commodity to be transported. However, people are now being discouraged from travelling, and it is uncertain whether they will return; point being, the task is not now merely to accommodate; we must attract passengers back onto trains, and a properly presented, comfortable service will help us do that.

    May 11, 2023
    Britain, British Rail, England, Great Western Railway, GWR, LNER, London, London & North Eastern Railway, Scotland, Train, Trains, Wales

  • Some Interesting Ideas From The 1930s That Never Really Caught On – Part 1

    Dear reader,

    It has been rather a while since we last spoke; nearly three years in fact. To give some perspective on how much I have been putting this off, and the spectacular laziness with which the phrase “we’ll get around to that” has been bandied around by myself, the last time I sat down to write an article for this site, the UK was between Covid lockdowns, Boris Johnson was still very firmly Prime Minister, and if one mentioned Russia, all people thought about was their slightly dodgy Sputnik vaccine then in development.

    Nobody, least of all myself, can tell how long this sudden burst of activity will last, but at the very least, welcome to the rather redesigned, slightly newspaper-like Peculiarly Pete, where the rambling will continue.

    In numerous ways, the world we live in today has been defined by the Second World War. For example, take the device you are reading this article on now; no matter whether it is a laptop, desktop, smartphone, tablet, or even a ZX Spectrum, it is some form of digital, reprogrammable computer. This technology, so dominant over the world today, may well never have come to be had WW2 never occurred. Indeed, both the British and the American programmes which resulted in the first digital computers had military applications in mind (although ours was kept a state secret until many decades later).

    But there are umpteen examples. About a week ago, I took a trip to Portugal, and to get there I spent several boring hours on a Ryanair flight; boring hours they may have been, but they were cheaper and shorter hours than would have been possible before the invention of the jet engine. While it is true that several different teams were working on these before the war, it would have taken far, far longer for these to come to production without it, and it is possible that their early issues may have proved too expensive.

    Meanwhile in the field of geopolitics, almost nothing makes sense without the Second World War. The People’s Republic of China we see today is the end result (after many, many twists and turns) of a chain of events which would have turned out very differently had Japan not invaded the country. Many other events in the modern world lend themselves to the Cold War, a direct result of the strange relationship between the allies in that war.

    It is clear therefore that the Second World War was a truly watershed event. Logically it follows (as you, my intelligent and very perceptive reader will have noticed) that the world beforehand must have been very different, and this logical assumption is largely true.

    In this world the defining event was the First World War. Perusing the issues of Popular Mechanics of the time, it is very clear that the threat of gas warfare was present in the 1930s imagination, just as it was present in the WW1 reality, and with 20 years of technical developments their descriptions at times sound apocalyptic.

    Fortunately, we know now that all powers involved in the eventual conflict refrained from using gas on the battlefield. Why was this? It is difficult to say precisely. While the Nazis did use gas in the Holocaust, even with their enemies closing in on Berlin, they did not use it against enemy troops or even enemy civilians. This was despite developing the first nerve agent, Sarin, a far more deadly and painful substance than anything any of the First World War armies had access to.

    I suspect the reasons are partially ideological, and partially practical. Ideological, because Hitler had himself been gassed during WW1 (and indeed at the end of it was in hospital recovering from such an attack), and may have decided not to inflict such on other soldiers; and practical, because quite apart from the problem of protecting one’s own troops, it was very clear that the allies could produce more of everything, including gas, than the Germans.

    Meanwhile, those with an eye on the future terrified themselves with visions of aerial bombardment from new, fast bombers that no fighter could possibly hope to catch. Casualties, it was assumed, would be in the tens or even hundreds of thousands from each raid; thankfully, their assumptions on the speed of bombers, the uselessness of fighters, and the accuracy of unguided bombs, proved to be unfounded. World War 2 bombing raids largely had to pick city-sized targets to give them a good chance of hitting, and even then, it would take the invention of the atomic bomb to give a realistic chance of the expected casualties.

    Of course many had much more immediate concerns; the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and subsequent Great Depression plunged millions into poverty, and even by the end of the 1930s many were still struggling. Just like today, governments were trying various schemes to create skills, employment and opportunity, but also like today, these met with varying degrees of success. But now it has been acknowledged, we shall not spend this entire article going on about it; partly because others would do a much better job, but mostly because it is already a very recognisable part of the 1930s.

    One of the revolutions already underway was that of motor vehicles. In previous times, the default (and largely only) form of land transport was the railway, but cars were improving substantially and becoming available to a far wider audience than ever before. Even if you were not lucky enough to be able to afford a car, new roads, paved with materials like asphalt and concrete, offered other possibilities; buses and lorries offered employment and indeed enjoyment to many. That many of these modern roads were constructed on the taxpayer’s dime, and in pure profit and loss terms were quite poor investments, was not mentioned.

    It thus became imperative that the railways develop a response in order to retain passengers and absolutely crucial farebox revenue. At the same time, the idea of using aerodynamic design to reduce drag (in various ways, many of which had almost no scientific value) was in vogue, to the point where even everyday household items such as radios and toasters were being ‘streamlined’.

    It was thus that the streamlined train was born. Starting with smaller items (railcars, the odd locomotive etc.), and eventually developing into complete trains, streamliners came of age in the 1930s. In many cases, this was merely a marketing exercise; the streamlining designed by Henry Dreyfuss for the 20th Century Limited (touted at the time with the nicely unprovable moniker of ‘World’s Most Famous Train’) almost certainly had no effect on drag, but it was sufficiently striking that it has become iconic of the era and indeed it graces the head of this article.

    Other approaches were more scientific; following a visit to Germany to see the new diesel railcars there, Sir Nigel Gresley, the Chief Mechanical Engineer of the LNER in Britain, decided to combine the drag reduction effect of streamlining with the greater power then available from steam engines. The result were the A4 class of Mallard fame, whose streamlining did have a measurable impact on performance.

    The idea of special, much, much faster trains with facilities unavailable elsewhere (for example, the A4-hauled Coronation of the period featured swivel armchairs in first class), did not last, at least not in streamlined form, for very long.

    Again, there were many different reasons. Quite apart from the fashion for streamlining beginning to die away after the war, there were myriad operational difficulties, at least in the UK. Having a small handful of extremely fast trains with all the rest still travelling at the same speeds makes for a signalling nightmare, and the braking technology of the day compounded these issues, with stopping distances making life extremely difficult.

    In the US, with steam swapped for new diesel power, streamlined trains survived for many years following the war. The market was rather different, with vast distances being covered by a small number of trains (for example, Union Pacific’s City of Los Angeles only became a daily service in the late 1940s), and with less dense traffic to get in the way of, the extra speed was less of a problem. Unfortunately, with the advent of interstate highways and the aforementioned jet aircraft, such services would struggle and few made it into the 1960s in any form, let alone streamlined.

    In the years since, particularly as regular speeds have increased, the use of aerodynamic design has made something of a comeback, and certainly today’s high speed railways would not be feasible without at least a token nod to drag reduction. Still, the modern (and far more sensible) fashion is to have more consistently timed trains, and the kinds of luxuries the streamliners of the 30s exuded are now present only rarely on charter trains.

    Elsewhere in the world of transport, things were even more different to today. Transcontinental travel was a far more difficult prospect given the limitations of technology; aeroplanes did of course exist but they were slow, their range was generally small, and air travel on them was a noisy, shaky, and often dangerous experience at the start of the 1930s.

    But things were beginning to change; monoplanes (that is, aeroplanes with just one set of wings) were replacing biplanes, and speed and range were increasing as a result. Engine power was constantly increasing, and by the end of the decade engines which could touch or even exceed 1,000 hp were becoming commercially available. Further, navigational aids which could make flight safer, particularly based upon radio, were beginning to be introduced, even if they could not always be relied upon (the last flight of Amelia Earhart is evidence of that).

    The world was still not ready for commercial air travel, however. There were very few long, paved runways anywhere in the world; these were even rare in the United States in which the most progress had been made. As an alternative, for the few who could afford to use aeroplanes, the only solution was to use a completely different medium from which to access the sky; the sea.

    Thus it was that the flying boats of this era at last crossed the Atlantic in one flight (with passengers, that is), with a rivalry developing between the Boeing-built ‘Clippers’ of Pan American airways and the Short-built ‘Empire’ flying boats of Britain’s Imperial Airways. Just like with the streamlined trains, it was imperative to justify the high ticket prices, and therefore luxury features like berths, dining rooms, even promenades (albeit rather small ones) proliferated.

    One might wonder why flying boats are so rare today; after all, why would one rely on runways when the sea is so abundant, not to mention all the lakes in the world?

    Well, there are downsides to the flying boat idea; for a start, if the aircraft has to float also, the shape that must be arrived at is not the ideal one for aerodynamics. There are other issues too; seawater is highly corrosive, and the sea is a bit wet and un-solid, which means that flying boats can be tricky to maintain. The crew must be trained in how to manoeuvre both in the air and on the water, which is a lot more difficult than it sounds.

    All this said, the main reason they disappeared (despite brave attempts such as the Saunders Roe Princess) is the proliferation of prepared runways following the Second World War. The Allies in particular made great use of airborne transport and built or substantially improved hundreds of airfields across the world, which would form the basis of the explosion in civil aviation in the 1950s and later.

    Many of you, dear readers, might think this is where our airborne stories end, content to watch land planes sail along today and make wistful comments about a 90-year old world none of us were a part of. But no, we are not finished, not just yet, because there are other ways of travelling in the sky.

    Back in the 18th Century, long before the Wright brothers, the first demonstration of human-carrying flight occurred when the Montgolfier brothers discovered that if air was heated, its density was reduced, and thus it would float above the surrounding air. To put it briefly; they had invented the hot air balloon. Such things were initially put to use either for amusement or for allowing militaries to see over the horizon, and in both roles their invention met with moderate success.

    However, the 19th Century would see two key developments which would turn an amusement into a somewhat serious form of transport. Firstly, gases even less dense than hot air were discovered and generated (notably hydrogen and helium), which could therefore lift even more weight in the same vehicle; and secondly, a device which could turn a dense, liquid fuel into movement was created: the internal combustion engine. With these developments in hand, the Airship became a possibility.

    While numerous countries experimented with airships, undoubtedly the most successful nation to build airships was Germany. Even before the First World War, it was possible to travel across Germany by airship, long before the advent of commercial airlines using aeroplanes, and during the war Zeppelins (named after their designer von Zeppelin) even became some of the first aircraft of any kind to engage in strategic bombing.

    Following the war, Germany’s airship industry was forced to build airships as part of war reparations, while other nations (notably Britain) tried to turn the technology into a viable transport system around their colonial empires. While the other nations failed, with high profile disasters such as the R101, Germany dug deep, having to support the ailing industry with subsidies and even public subscriptions; the end result was LZ 127 Graf Zeppelin, first flying in the late 1920s.

    The exploits of this airship in the 1930s are deserving of their own article, and perhaps I will write one in future, but suffice to say she was successful, becoming the first airship to circumnavigate the world, being repaired in flight in an extremely daring fashion to complete the trip. She would go on to maintain a regular airship service between Germany and Brazil, something which would have been absolutely impossible with aeroplanes of that day.

    But Germany’s airship industry was planning bigger and better things; in 1932 construction was begun on an even more capable ship, and this one you may have heard of; LZ 129 Hindenburg. Eventually requiring substantial backing from the Nazi party (whom the Zeppelin company chairman, Hugo Eckener, personally disliked), she was completed in 1936, and in a matter of months pressed into service on the Atlantic runs to New York and Brazil.

    Hindenburg offered a far smoother, more luxurious alternative to the still-developing flying boats, and was around twice as fast as the ocean liners steaming down below. Some of the trappings of the ocean liner were retained; she featured promenade decks, a grand piano, a restaurant with silver service, even a smoking room and cocktail bar, and despite the price of the tickets (several thousand pounds each way in today’s money), Hindenburg was a compelling option.

    Unfortunately, the end came for Hindenburg on May 6, 1937. While attempting to land at Lakehurst Naval Air Station following an electrical storm, a small spark caused the lifting gas, hydrogen, to ignite, and the whole ship was consumed by flame in seconds. The incredible fact of the day was not that this had happened; but that some of the passengers and crew survived; alas, transatlantic airship travel did not, with even the ever-reliable Graf Zeppelin being retired shortly thereafter.

    While the issues with hydrogen as a lifting gas could have been solved (helium, another lifting gas, was what the Hindenburg was originally designed to use, and is inert), there were some fundamental problems with the idea of airship travel.

    Firstly, even assuming everything worked, airships were very labour intensive to operate, really more like a ship than a conventional aircraft. The bridge crew, for instance, included separate people working both the elevators and the rudder, not to mention an officer of the watch, and a gas board to monitor to check for leaks and purity of the gas. There were also 4 diesel engines to be monitored, not to mention separate navigational equipment, and yet more crew on standby to make repairs to the canvas. Once the ship’s crew had been assembled, they then also required stewards to look out for the passengers in the luxury expected; combine all this and it was not at all unusual for the crew to outnumber the passengers.

    Even without the crew, these ships were farcically large for their capacity (as required by something literally lighter than the air it displaces); Hindenburg could accommodate a measly 70 passengers, but was over 3 times the length of a modern Boeing 747 (which can accommodate literally hundreds).

    There have been numerous attempts to revive the idea of commercial airships since (their huge loiter time and ability to come to a stand do potentially have uses), but so far none has succeeded, and it seems very likely to stay that way.

    In any case, with the word counter having merrily ticked to well over 2500, now seems as good a time as any to sign off. Next time in this little series, we’ll have a good ramble about some other interesting airships, take a good look at their sea-based counterparts, and ponder some of the might-have-beens had history taken a slightly different turn.

    All that remains now though is to wish you an excellent day, thank you for reading, and hope that if you did enjoy this, you might pass it on.

    May 1, 2023

  • The engineering that makes the world go – shipping.

    Dear reader,

    It may not have escaped your notice that I focus heavily on railways on this corner of the internet. This is perhaps giving you a false impression, if for some reason you use my blog as your only indicator how the world works; much as I would like it to be the case, trains worldwide do not make up the majority of transport, although in places they are significant.

    The truth of the matter is that the vast majority of stuff that you buy has to go by ship at some stage. It is worth, before we continue, considering why this might be, by considering the other options.

    I have gone on and on and on about the low rolling resistance of trains, and how this makes them ideal for all manner of things. But a train can only be so wide or long before it starts affecting other trains, infrastructure and so on. Roads have all the same issues and also much worse rolling resistance, although the greater freedom of movement is handy for deliveries. Both modes, of course, require there to be land, or some kind of physical infrastructure, which is not always terribly obliging.

    This leaves us with ships and aeroplanes. I could get into some tangent about the possibilities for airships, but that is a story for another day. Aeroplanes are a wonderful invention, and are by far the fastest way of transporting stuff. That said, they are not without their issues, not least of which is the limitation on weight; even a very large freighter like a Boeing 747 8F only has a maximum payload of 134 tonnes, quite pitifully small compared with the thousands a train might be able to carry. The fuel consumption is also quite high.

    The only real option then is shipping. Ships have huge advantages for long distance transport – no infrastructure outside ports, no worries about the ground being able to support the loads and no worries about allowing freight to pass in each direction.

    Since the invention of iron and later steel shipbuilding in the 19th century, ship sizes have been able to increase enormously. Even when sail was still the common method of propulsion, the famous Cutty Sark (and her lesser known, slightly older competitor Thermopylae, which she was suspiciously similar to) had a frame of wrought iron, although everything you can see on the outside is wood.

    It is worth here saying something about how one measures the size of a ship. Thanks to Archimedes we know that in order for a ship to float, it must displace the same weight of water as she weighs. This is how a ship’s basic displacement is calculated, as is her deadweight tonnage (DWT), the maximum weight of the ship fully laden with cargo, crew, fuel, provisions and so on. However, you may also hear the term gross register tonnage, or GRT, which is actually a measure of volume inside the ship, each registered tonne being considered equal to 100 cubic feet. Net register tonnage refers to the actual cargo volume inside the ship, and so is just like GRT minus all the engines and so on.

    The Cutty Sark and Thermopylae had displacements of around 2100 tonnes. In theory, one could tow the ships on rails on a modern train quite easily. Each could carry several hundred tonnes of tea from China or wool from Australia.

    For comparison, a large modern container ship such as the Maersk Triple E class vessels have an empty displacement of 55,000 tonnes, and fully laden the deadweight tonnage is 196,000 tonnes. Since the Ford Fiesta has become something of a yardstick, I have done some quick sums and worked out that the deadweight tonnage is equivalent to the weight of 161,983 and a half Ford Fiestas. In other words, if you tried to make the weight of this one ship out of brand new Ford Fiestas, and you bought every single new one produced for Britain for a year, you would still have to buy every single new one in Britain for another 58 days to complete the job.

    Another useful yardstick is the Blue Whale, adults of which weigh somewhere in the region of 150 tonnes, meaning that to make the deadweight tonnage one would need at least 1,306.7 adult Blue Whales. Even assuming the most optimistic estimate of the population, this means that the total tonnage of just this class of ships exceeds the weight of all the Blue Whales in the world.

    I admit, it’s a slightly extreme example; until quite recently the size of the locks on the Panama Canal limited the size of many container ships, and this limited size became known as “panamax”. Various other “max” sizes also exist, as ports do not have infinitely deep water or infinitely sized docks. That said, ports are now bigger than ever, and the problem with Panama has now been solved, or at least improved with numerous upgrades to the canal.

    But how on Earth are such large ships even possible? Well, the obvious answer is to go on about the structure of such things, like the torsion box that goes around the ship, and how the huge holds support containers stacked enormously high, and how one can’t actually see most of the containers inside the ship. I know, dear reader, that while some of you might find such things interesting, what you really want to know is how you push something that vast along. As usual, I will not get to the answer straight away, and instead meander through some other interesting but only tangentially related topics.

    What shape do you think the front bit (the bow) of such a ship should be? Now many of you would simply reply that it needs to be pointy to push water out of the way. Surprisingly enough, this is only half correct, because as a ship so built travels through the water, it creates a bow wave, and a large wake. This wake causes a significant amount of drag on the hull, for complicated hydrodynamic reasons I can’t be bothered to go into here.

    In modern large ships, this is counteracted by having a large, blister-like structure just under the water, called a bulbous bow, which creates its own bow wave. As the two bow waves interact, they cancel each other out, reducing the wake and reducing drag, saving a lot of fuel along the way. This only works at certain speeds, since the bow waves are affected by speed, but you get the picture.

    The beating heart of these ships though are the diesel engines. The Maersk Triple Es are a little unusual in that they have two engines, rather than one big one, but to give you some sense of scale each of the two diesel engines produces 42,000 horsepower. They are so large, it is actually possible to stand inside the cylinders, and it is absolutely essential to have stairs and walkways around the outside. These drive the ship along via a propeller directly connected to the output, with no reduction gearing at all. Surprisingly enough, each engine actually runs very slowly (less than 18 rpm), to reduce mechanical wear, as well as noise, and these engines are rather efficient, with 50% efficiency being not uncommon.

    I will return briefly to our Ford Fiesta comparison here. The most powerful diesel engine ever offered in a Fiesta was a 1.5 litre with 118 hp (now discontinued). This means that you would need to connect about 356 Ford Fiestas to match just one of these engines (in production terms, this is just 27 short of a year’s production for the UK).

    You might be wondering why in an age of environmental consciousness, ships still rely on diesel. The answer principally is the energy density of diesel fuel, which is far, far better than a battery or hydrogen or any other alternative fuel. Bio-diesel fuels are not yet available on the scale necessary, and so the only thing that can really be done for the moment (without compromising on the space available for cargo) is to improve the efficiency of the ship and her engines.

    And it is these engines, beating slowly in the hearts of mighty ships, that move containers across the world. Containers are such a standard unit now that you, dear reader, may sometimes hear ships described in terms of twenty-foot equivalent units or TEU, the size of a twenty foot container; over 20,000 of these can fit on newer ships (although 40 foot containers are far more common in all fairness).

    In these containers come nearly everything you buy, from electronics to clothes, to some food, to consumer products, to virtually every computer, phone or tablet you have ever laid eyes upon.

    But this is not the only kind of thing we require to live. These products must be made in the first place, from raw materials, and these raw materials are seldom found conveniently next to where things are produced. Iron ore, for example, is found in many places around the world, but not much in China, despite the fact that most steel is produced there. Even the bread we eat doesn’t last long without going stale; it is produced from grain, which lasts much longer, and this too has to be transported from where it is plentiful to where it is not. And the lifeblood (much as we would wish it not to be) of our modern civilisation, oil, that too must get to where it needs to be used, where pipelines don’t exist.

    For such tasks, we need bulk carriers. These ships are much the same as container ships, but optimised to store large bulk cargoes in enormous, cathedral-like holds. Many of these are extremely heavy and unwieldy when they are fully laden, which often necessitates the use of tugs to maneuver these behemoths in port, notably for oil tankers.

    These ships and their crews, braving oceans many thousands of miles across, deliver the modern world to you. I am repeating myself here, but it really is true. Even 200 years ago, this kind of global trade would only have existed in the minds of dreamers and lunatics, and yet we all enjoy its fruits now, simply by driving a car (I neglected to mention car carrying ships here, but I did at least remember to mention oil tankers briefly) or shopping in a supermarket.

    I do hope, dear reader, I have entertained you at least somewhat, and that at least some of the wonder I feel at the world has been rubbed off on you.








    August 23, 2020
    Bow, Bulk, Engines, Ship, Shipping, Ships, Trade

  • Why the U.S. has a terrible but brilliant railway system.

    Dear reader,

    If you are of the internationally minded type, and know much about the United States of America, you will notice that Americans very rarely reference going on a train. You have probably heard of the New York subway, and you might have seen some very lucky American making some journey on a metro somewhere, but on the whole, Americans get around by car or by aeroplane (what they would, quite incorrectly, call an airplane).

    It might surprise you, dear reader, to find out that once America’s railroads were the primary mode of transport, and that this state of affairs continued until well into the 1940s. This was no Victorian obsession.

    The story of how things went from that state of affairs to that it is now is complicated, and involves many surprising parties, some measure of betrayal and more than a little cold war suspicion. I am not an expert on this period, but I will attempt to do it some justice in the limited space here.

    Our story really begins in the late 1930s. It is not true to say that cars were not a factor during this time; in the country that had given birth to the Model T Ford 20 years earlier, automobiles were nothing new. Nor were automobile focused streets and highways a particularly new concept; many schemes were already under construction.

    It is also not true to say that at this time there was no competition from aircraft. And I do say aircraft because at the time there was a distinction made between lighter than air (airships, though they were on the way out) and heavier than air aircraft (aeroplanes, helicopters were not yet a thing). Mail by air was reasonably common, and the transport of passengers not uncommon, at least among the very rich.

    Despite this, though, the railroads were still large, complex, and powerful. It was possible and indeed desirable to travel from coast to coast by train, as well as to innumerable cities across the country. Competition between companies was rife, famously between the Pennsylvania and New York Central, each with its glamourous flagship train (Pennsylvania had the Broadway Limited, and the New York Central had the 20th Century Limited, which it confusingly dubbed ‘the most famous train in the world’).

    U.S. railroads led the world in numerous ways. While in Britain, most freight trains were still loose coupled affairs with minimal brakes, in the U.S. continuous braked freight trains had long been the norm. Further, while British train guards and firemen would be climbing down between coaches to couple trains, automatic couplers were entirely standard on US railroads.

    Steam engines were still very common but diesel power was being pioneered in many different forms, from streamlined railcars to multi-unit locomotives.

    Speaking of streamlining, this was very in vogue in this period. Although much of the work was to make trains look more stylish, some had a serious point; reducing aerodynamic drag. The U.S. railroads excelled not so much at ultimate top speed as sustained speed over distance, as befits the wide distances between cities, and speed and comfort over what the rest of the world might consider rubbish track.

    This gives you, dear reader, a flavour of how things were, but does not explain why that’s not the case today. The answer really begins at World War 2, as so much of the 20th century does.

    World War 2 spurred a hitherto unheard of level of technical innovation, particularly in the field of aviation. At the beginning of the war, biplanes had finally given way to monoplanes, and piston engines were pushing 1,000 hp. By the end of it, pilots were flying around in some parts of the world in swept wing jet fighters that could touch well over 400 mph. Pilots who were less lucky could expect to fly in aircraft with piston engines with over 2,000 hp.

    One other unexpected side-effect of the war was the construction across large parts of the world of high quality paved runways, in order to service the large air forces of the various powers. Combine this with the large factories used to mass producing large all-metal aeroplanes, and the stage was set for a post-war aviation boom.

    Large airliners were going further, faster and more comfortably between airports that were capable of serving them. Further, the U.S. government continued to subsidise the air mail business, hoping to encourage new air routes and continue U.S. innovation in aviation.

    These were beginning to make inroads into the railroad’s business, at least on long haul routes of many hundreds of miles. It would take the arrival of the jet airliner in the late 1950s to almost completely destroy this market, but in the meantime, the shorter haul routes between nearby cities seemed safe.

    Or were they? I had mentioned before that cars and highways were nothing new, but after the war, both were taken to new heights. The large factories that had fed the U.S. war machine could in peacetime be turned to other things, one of which was cars. Cheaper, more capable cars rolled off production lines and onto the driveways of new suburbs, which had been created primarily for the benefit of car drivers.

    By itself, this might have been a challenge that the railroads could rise to, but they quickly found that the game had been rigged, by a rather unlikely source. And to explain that, we have to take a detour into a world of Cold War paranoia.

    Following the end of the Second World War, the world found itself with two principal superpowers; the U.S.A and the U.S.S.R, each keen to demonstrate the superiority of its economic system (if Soviet Socialism can even be described as such), and expand its global influence. To this end, the world became increasingly split into nations that supported one or the other, and the Cold War began.

    The two principal nations in this battle of wills had nuclear weapons, and, while this made a conventional military conflict impossible, it left a few problems. Not least of these was the possibility that one side could cripple the other’s capabilities by taking out its nuclear weapons first, the so-called ‘first strike’ scenario.

    In the early days of the Cold War, when each side relied heavily on aircraft dropping their nuclear weapons, the vulnerable points were airfields. But what if there was some way of having large, flat, straight, paved areas as a standard feature? What if there was just so much pavement that destroying it all was practically impossible? What if they could also use these for other military vehicles? What about for rapid evacuations and troop movements?

    And so, what some in the car world had dreamed of for years finally came to pass. It would be, and remains, the single largest, most expensive infrastructure project in history: the Interstate Highway System. With Department of Defense funding, this became a reality.

    Ah, you may say, with all this investment and good fortune for the other modes of transport, surely the railroads got something good too? Well, they certainly got some extra freight business during the war, keeping the war machine turning, but beyond that… not much. Suffice to say, the 1950s saw the railroads in decline, and the 1960s saw almost a complete collapse.

    Eventually, in the 1970s, what passenger trains remained were combined and nationalised to form AmTrack. AmTrack owned very little track of its own, just the North-East corridor (which would later be reborn into the almost European-style mainline railway it is today). But this story is not about passenger trains, at least not from this point.

    Because, while for passengers the railroads were no longer a good option, there is one inescapable property of railways that counts in their favour. Railways run trains with steel wheels on steel rails, producing very low rolling resistance. Much lower than a road vehicle, and without the immense power needed to achieve flight. This can be exploited to transport very heavy loads without much force being needed, ideal for freight.

    Particularly in the last 30 years, U.S. railroads have become possibly the greatest, most efficient freight transport system in the world. They transport a far greater proportion of freight by rail than in just about any other developed nation, with private companies competing to slash freight rates and get ever more efficient.

    Part of this is due to the extreme train lengths and weights they achieve. In Great Britain, for reference, a very heavy freight train might be pushing 2,500 tonnes, no small amount compared to the few tonnes a lorry might carry. In the U.S. certain types of freight train average over 10,000 tonnes, and even their container trains can achieve averages of nearly 5,000.

    This sheer scale, mated to low rolling resistance, means efficiency unheard of elsewhere. For example, Union Pacific estimates that it can move a tonne of freight 480 miles with just 1 gallon of diesel. If you drive a Ford Fiesta, this is roughly equivalent to getting 397 mpg, a huge improvement over Ford’s claimed best of 65.7 mpg.

    Of course, we do have to mention the rather lower standards of trackwork in the U.S., as well as the rather poorer safety record of their railroads. I appreciate that given recent events this might not sound true, but in Britain we have by far the safest railway in Europe and worldwide we are amongst the best performing for safety. U.S. standards and safety devices (or lack thereof) are, I must admit, a bit shocking to a British audience, but the fact of the matter is that with the vast majority of trains being freight, through routes largely in the middle of nowhere, the potential for injury and loss of life is lower.

    By finding a market that very few others can touch them in, that is, long distance, heavy freight for very low prices, the U.S. railroads have become world leaders once again. While in Europe we may scoff at their lack of proper high speed routes or even passenger trains at all in some parts, it is undeniable that nothing in Europe can touch the Americans for freight.

    Either way, dear reader, I do hope you have come away from this article marginally better informed than you were, and that you have a splendid day.






    August 22, 2020
    1930s, 1940s, 1950s, Brakes, Cargo, Couplings, Economy, Efficiency, Freight, Market, Markets, Passengers, Rail, Railroad, Railway, Rates, rolling, Rolling resistance, Safety, Train, Trains, Transport, U.S., U.S.A, Union Pacific, UP, US, USA

  • Some thoughts on architecture, modern and otherwise.

    Dear reader,

    Today’s topic really is a controversial one. Or is it? Certainly in the discussions online, there is a sizeable minority, either of genuine architects or fans of their ilk, who support modern architecture, and scoff at any attempt to recreate the styles of the past. But they are, I will argue, in the minority.

    I think it is important to remember that what we might term “modern” architecture is a bit older than most people think. Certainly it can trace its roots to the Bauhaus movement of the 1920s, and in some cases even earlier. The trend for large sheets of glass on buildings began much earlier, in fact the first buildings constructed in this manner were in the Victorian era (though it is true that at the time the practice was far from common and widely derided).

    Many would say that the rise of bad architecture really was in the 1950s and 1960s. It is obvious that during this period, many quite horrifically ugly buildings were put up. Bare concrete looks can look an attractive off-white when first applied, but alas, it water stains badly, and besides, the ugly geometric shapes did little to enhance the appeal of such buildings.

    One of the aesthetic horrors of this period was pebbledash. Large panels filled with stones, while vaguely reminiscent of a shingle beach, looked very bad indeed on flat, boring panels. I suppose at the very least, the attempt to use natural patterns was welcome.

    But a lot of people are prepared to give any building that isn’t concrete a free pass, no matter how ugly or downright insulting it is. Many large buildings are now constructed using a steel frame, onto which large, flat panels (usually either glass or some god awful cladding) are placed mounted.

    I do not dispute that this is an effective building method; it is far easier and quicker than most other methods, and allows pre-fabrication of virtually everything before it arrives on site. Coupled with modern surveying methods, this allows for astounding levels of precision in construction (I was taught, for example, that being even 5 mm out is often unacceptable).

    I also do not dispute that glass is useful; natural light is good for you, and can often reduce the energy use of the building. Depending on the location, the view can also be quite the advantage too.

    Unfortunately, while these buildings are quick and effective to construct, and quite light, they have the enormous disadvantage of being universally terrible to look at. Modern “architects” seem to have got it into their heads that the only appropriate shape for a building is a geometric one. Detailing has become something of a lost art; the modern fashion is minimalism; of showing off clean, uninterrupted lines, or, in real terms, showing off nothing, displaying nothing but a cold reflection.

    Ah you may say, does this not also make the building cheaper? The answer is neither yes nor no. It is true that traditional buildings require craftspeople who need to be paid. Stonemasons in particular can be very pricey, but this is partly as a result of the fact that there are very few of them; one cannot escape the laws of supply and demand.

    However, one underestimates the level of craftmanship that goes into minimal buildings. The extreme precision I talked about earlier is in fact essential if these buildings are to look as they are supposed to. There can be no scruffy joints between ceilings and floors, for example, because there are no skirting boards to cover this up, necessitating skilled (and therefore expensive) plasterwork. Each panel has to fit perfectly because there are no details to cover up some small imperfection, and therefore the engineering standards required are so much higher. For these reasons, I would object to the idea that buildings have to look boring because we cannot afford anything else.

    All this is a form of preamble, to give some general points and background. Now I must make the point that inspired me to write this article.

    The simple idea is this; most people vastly prefer traditional architecture to the modern alternatives. People flock to see the beauty of Paris, but very few want to see Munich. Tourists wonder at the grandeur of St Paul’s cathedral; a vastly smaller number, I suspect, want to look at the Gherkin.

    It is simply an irrelevant point to say that beauty is subjective. While it is true that every person has a slightly different conception of what they find beautiful, there are things that most people would agree are beautiful. Since public buildings have to be viewed and used by the majority, it baffles me that organisations choose architects and designs with such niche and baffling tastes.

    But what exactly is it people like about traditional architecture? There is, after all, a huge variety of architectural styles, but all of them share certain things in common. These are mainly to do with human scales; details are often modeled on things that humans can relate to like leaves. Partly due to limitations of technology, many old buildings are never particularly tall, nor do they have huge, unsupported overhangs. The appeal appears to come from the fact that they are intuitive and obviously human.

    To illustrate the points that I am making, let me show you Birmingham, certainly not a particularly romantic city. Now, while many would deride the city, she is not without her highlights. For example, look at the details on this wall

    Wonderful, isn’t it? Very neat brickwork, detailing, coats of arms, interesting but not overwhelming shapes and colours. Truly, a superb little gem in the middle of Birmingham. Unfortunately, this lovely piece is somewhat overlooked due to its surroundings…

    Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this is one of the walls enclosing Snow Hill railway station. This place is the tragedy of (at least some aspects of) modernity in microcosm.

    Snow Hill station can trace its roots back all the way to the 1850s, when it was built by the Great Western Railway company as a temporary wooden structure, on the site of an old glassworks. It was rebuilt several times over the years; the most significant of these rebuilds took place between 1906 and 1912. This rebuild was designed to allow the station to compare with New Street, the other large railway station in the city, and its grandeur and luxury was such that reportedly Harland & Wolffe, builders of the Titanic, were jealous of the first class waiting rooms.

    The route the station served, from London Paddington, was in direct competition with the London North Western Railway’s route from London Euston, which went (and still in fact goes) to Birmingham New Street.

    Snow Hill, however, was able to survive two world wars, and remained reasonably competitive well into the 1960s, by which point the world was beginning to catch up with the railways as a whole. Two factors would lead to the downfall of Snow Hill; Post World War 2, the Attlee government had nationalised the railways, but perhaps more importantly, a new, exciting form of transport was beginning to show itself; the car.

    Cars had been around for quite some time, but by the 1960s they were faster, more reliable and, essentially, more affordable to buy and run than ever. Exciting new infrastructure in the form of motorways was springing up everywhere to provide for these new cars, and thus people were buying them in droves.

    This was causing a drop in passenger numbers on the railways, not to mention freight volumes lost to modern, capable lorries. British Railways, as it was then, was struggling to catch up with the modern world, and hemorrhaging money in the process.

    Into this melee stepped Dr Beeching. This is not the place for a detailed discussion of his career, but he felt that the way to fix the railways’ money problems was to economise. Where there had been two previously competing railways, he proposed, there should only be one. Why have two stations when one would do? After all, money could be put into improving the remaining one.

    And so it was in Birmingham. Much of Snow Hill’s traffic was transferred to New Street or simply dispensed with altogether. Snow Hill was left to rot, its grand canopies now sheltering a car park.

    It will surprise some readers to learn that this was not the real tragedy of the piece. Left to rot it may have been, but the buildings remained. Their heritage was not, at least in the early 1970s, completely lost. No, the real tragedy was that they wanted to have a railway station on the site.

    Yes, you read that correctly. It was decided that the old station was subsiding, and that the car park needed to be kept, and therefore the old station needed to be demolished in order to make way for what we now see. That the new one could scarcely have been uglier, or that the passenger environment could scarcely have been less inviting, seemed to not be on the agenda.

    If you are wondering about what happened to New Street, you are also in for a disappointment; the station was rebuilt in the 1960s, to a rather horrible but higher capacity concrete design, with the platforms all under concrete with little ventilation. The station has become more pleasant in recent years, but very little remains of the original.

    The case of Snow Hill is by no means unique; much of the Birmingham skyline has been transformed over the past 50 or so years. Fairly modest traditional buildings like this:

    The corner of Corporation / New Street. Plenty of detail here. Everywhere one looks the craftsman has been at work.

    Have been replaced with this kind of thing…

    Primark, Birmingham. There is nothing about this building one cannot appreciate at a glance. It is simply made up of triangles crudely wedged together.

    That this is a downgrade is obvious. One other thing to appreciate is the vast gulf of asphalt road between where this photograph was taken and the building. This is yet another mistake that has ruined a lot of cities, replacing charming cobbles with plain black tarmac with large markings and road signs designed exclusively around cars, rather than the people actually in the city.

    Other mistakes in Birmingham include this:

    Cornwall House, Birmingham. That the photograph is not correctly focused is irrelevant; even if focused, the building has virtually no interest.

    Large, unfriendly glass panels, small, grotty openings inexplicably on their own to the left, waterstained pebble dash… one can scarcely conceive an uglier building.

    Not that they haven’t tried. This rather bizarre affair is actually in the possession of the Teenage Cancer Trust, a very worthy charity, but I do have to wonder just what the architect was smoking when he came up with this:

    Teenage Cancer Trust Building, Birmingham. Angles, angles galore. Oh and windows. And a bit of green. And a railing. What are we making again? Oh yes, a building? Ah. Right.

    It seems even the statues despair at this monstrosity, as evidenced outside:

    Statue and pond outside the Teenage Cancer Trust Building, Birmingham. A rather moving illustration of grief and despair amongst a host of ugliness.

    Some architects have tried to ape past styles, but do so in a modern way. These buildings really demonstrate the phrase “so near, and yet so far”. Let’s take a look at one.

    Unidentified building near canal, Birmingham.

    Forget for a minute the bizarre bridge over the canal in the foreground. It is also terrible, and completely out of keeping with the industrial heritage of the canals, but it is not the point of our discussion.

    Well, you might say, this has some old building materials, a bit of brick here and there, and a few details, what is the problem?

    Well, the first issue is the large, flat expanses of glass in between the brickwork. The natural light is good, but the rather blank reflection in them does little for the character of the building, not to mention being expensive, difficult to transport and fragile.

    The other major issue is the brickwork itself. An attempt has been made to make it look traditional, but it looks wrong, and indeed you will see this on many buildings. This has to do with the way that the brickwork is put together, and the principal problem is the “bond” of the brickwork, or its arrangement.

    You see, bricks have several faces. There is the shiner, the largest face, which is usually faced downwards, the header, which is the smallest face, on the end, and the stretcher, which is the other face.

    Why is this relevant? In the old days, most buildings were single-brick, that is, there was only one wall. Therefore, this wall needed to be very strong as it alone had to hold up the building, and the brick “bond” must include some headers faced outwards alongside the stretchers. This type of construction is not without its problems, as it is quite a poor insulator both of heat and sound.

    The more modern way of doing it is to build cavity walls, effectively two walls with a gap in between. This is a much better insulator, and it means that neither wall has to be as strong as the old ones. Therefore, it is possible to use a “stretcher” bond, just made up of stretchers facing outwards, which, while weaker, saves bricks.

    It is, however, one reason why modern brickwork never looks quite correct, coupled with thicker modern mortars. One other problem with modern bricks is that they are often made to look “rustic” by printing patterns into the brick, but in reality if you look at the wall you’ll notice the supposedly random patterns repeat and the illusion falls apart. Suffice to say, these walls do not actually fit in and look hopelessly generic.

    Perhaps I am after all an old fashioned sort of chap. Perhaps I am just resisting “progress” or some such. In any case, dear reader, I do hope I have made some decent points, and I do hope you enjoyed this rather rambling explanation of my opinion.

    August 21, 2020

  • Le Mans 2019 – In Numbers

    Believe it or not, dear reader, this is not the first time that I have sat down to write an article on this topic. However, I fell into something of a trap with that article, trying to get across every single nook, cranny and detail I could, along with a plethora of photographs. This may eventually have been released, but alas, I find myself rather short of time.

    This left me with the problem of how to tell you, my dear and valued reader, about the greatest motor race on earth. It occurs to me that since the race begins this Saturday, I am running low on time, which means that this article you are reading right now must be delivered very soon.

    What I eventually decided to do is to describe the race in terms of something which (hopefully) everyone can understand, something very simple indeed; numbers. Starting with…

    24

    No. of hours the race takes place over. This has generated some of the greatest drama in motor racing history, since a car that has a problem may still be fixed and come back to be competitive. Last year, for example, the car that came first had a shunt on the first lap.

    3

    No. of drivers for each car. You didn’t think that one person would be driving for the whole thing did you? Well, in the past people did, but these days, each car has 3 drivers assigned to it, who take turns (called stints) to get in the car and drive.

    62

    No. of cars on the entry list. The shear numbers mean that there is bound to be close racing somewhere throughout the race; it also means that the faster cars have interesting high-speed traffic to deal with, which is exacerbated by the fact the next number is conveying…

    4

    No. of “classes” of car in the race. There are two for Prototypes, that is, cars that are specifically designed for endurance racing (LMP1 and LMP2) and two for GTs, or Grand Tourers, that is, highly modified road cars (GTE Pro and GTE Am). To briefly explain these classes, from slowest to fastest:

    • GTE Am: These are run by privateer teams, who don’t manufacture their own cars. The drivers are not professionals, and so although the cars are similar to the other GT category, they tend to be somewhat slower.
    • GTE Pro: Similar cars to GTE Am, but cars are run by professional teams; mainly manufacturer-backed.
    • LMP2: Cars here are procured by teams from one of three manufacturers, and then run by the team privately. Since all the machinery is similar, the competition is fierce.
    • LMP1: The fastest category, teams here are allowed to develop their cars to go as fast as possible, within certain rules. Hybrids are also allowed (and we’re talking more like a Maclaren P1 than a Prius), although these days only Toyota are still using them.

    3544

    No. of tyres allocated. Each class of car gets a slightly different allocation, but the cars are allocated around 50 – 60 tyres each for the race. Granted, not all of them will get used; one will not of course use wet weather tyres in the dry, for example, but it does give a good sense of scale.

    8.467

    No. of miles of track. The track itself, the Circuit de la Sarthe, is a circuit partly made up of converted roads, and partly specialist race track. It is steeped in history; almost every corner has become a famous motorsport name.

    9

    Largest no. of victories a driver has attained at Le Mans; this record was set by Danish driver Tom Kristensen, though he hasn’t raced here since 2013. He managed this over a 17 year period, which goes to show just how tough this race is.

    19

    Largest no. of overall victories for a single manufacturer; this record is held by Porsche, but again, they achieved this over around 50 years.


    This years race begins, as I write this, in around 10 minutes. I would of course highly recommend that you give it a look, but other than that, all that is left is to wish you a pleasant and interesting day, until the next time.


    Picture credits:

    – Featured Image: United Autosports via Wikimedia Commons (Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/)

     

    June 15, 2019
    Circuit de la Sarthe, GTE, GTE Am, GTE Pro, Le Mans, LMP1, LMP2, Racing

  • The New East Midlands Franchise & Associated Fallout

    Dear reader, as you may be aware, I frequent the East Midlands railway network. This activity brings a variety of experiences, some good, some bad, and some ugly. For example, while I have had some excellent journeys on the Midland Mainline on various fast trains, I have also witnessed the rather tragic state of affairs that is the regular single-coach train between Derby and Crewe. I was also aware that with changes to disabled access regulations, and increasing passenger numbers, the Inter-City rolling stock could not stay as it is.

    Against this backdrop I looked forward to a new franchise being awarded. We now know who the winner of that competition is, but there has been considerable fallout from decisions taken surrounding it, and so this article will come in two parts:

    Part 1: The New Franchise

    After much pushing back of the date it was to begin, the winner of the competition, to take over in August, was announced as Abellio. Now, Abellio are not complete newcomers to running trains in this country – they already run the Greater Anglia and ScotRail franchises – and indeed they are the commercial arm of the Netherlands’ state railway operator, so we naturally expect great things.

    That’s all very well and good, but what are they promising? For the purposes of this article, I shall split the proposals up into 2 broad categories:

    Inter-City

    These are the trains serving London, Leicester, Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield and so on. At up to 125 mph these are considerably faster than all the others run by the franchise, and they serve a slightly different market.

    Apart from a smattering of timetable changes and tweaks (for example more trains calling at Luton) Abellio propose to replace the existing fleet (a mixture of decades-old High Speed Trains and more recent “Meridian” trains) with a completely new fleet of bi-mode trains. “bi-mode” means that these trains will run on electricity where there are overhead wires and diesel engines the rest of the time.

    This wasn’t their idea, as the Department for Transport has been pushing for these on the Midland Mainline for quite some while now. I personally think this is somewhat unwise – the bi-mode train must lug about a diesel engine and fuel when running on electricity, both of which are useless to it when running in this mode. Equally, it must lug about a whole host of useless electrical equipment when it is running on diesel. This naturally has an impact on the train’s performance, particularly on diesel.

    Such problems are further compounded by the fact that as it stands the route is only being electrified as far as Market Harborough, meaning that about half the route will have to be done on diesel power, with potentially worse performance than the existing “Meridian” trains. Giving the trains better performance on diesel only is likely to be expensive and make them heavier, passing the cost either onto the train leasing company or Network Rail who maintain the infrastructure.

    Ideally, the entire route would be electrified, and pure electric trains (which are lighter and cheaper) would have been ordered. Alas, we may only hope that whoever gets the contract to build these trains has been very clever in their design.

    Regional

    These trains go all over the East Midlands, stopping at all kinds of smaller stations. This is a very different market, in fact, most of these trains were once upon a time operated by a completely different franchise called Central Trains, but I digress.

    The proposals here are somewhat less ambitious. Apart from the usual timetable changes and other service tweaks (notably more Sunday services), Abellio propose to introduce “refurbished modern trains”, a phrase which gives little away as to what they might turn out to be. We do get some clues in the list of features these trains are supposed to have, as alongside WiFi and all the other mod cons is air conditioning.

    Air conditioning is significant because currently a good chunk of the East Midlands Trains fleet does not have it, relying instead on opening windows for ventilation. Thus, without heavy modification, we are going to see many of these trains go.

    What will replace them? My money would be on trains drafted in from elsewhere, which is not necessarily a bad thing – far better to give perfectly good trains a stout refurbishment and put them to work where they are needed than to scrap them.

    The wildcard of all the proposals is the trialling of hydrogen fuel cell trains. I am of course very pleased about this development, but I really have talked about Hydrogen quite enough on this website.


    Part 2: Fallout

    The big news did not end with the ascension of Abellio. The incumbent, Stagecoach, were banned from bidding – not just for this but also for the Southeastern and West Coast Partnership franchises. This was because the Department for Transport was not happy with the pensions arrangements in their bids.

    Railway pensions are a looming issue that has thus far gone largely unnoticed. Some sources claim that the pensions deficit for the rail industry could be as large as £5-6 billion, a not-insignificant cost I am sure you will agree. Even if it is not quite that large, there is a bill that will need paying, and an argument over who should settle it.

    Who is responsible will depend on your reading of the situation, but I do think it was unfair to simply ban Stagecoach from bidding for 3 franchises. For a start, on the West Coast Partnership franchise (that will include HS2, by the way) Stagecoach were bidding with Virgin – banning their bid could see the end of Virgin Trains, an operator that has done an enormous amount to raise standards on the Great British railway.

    This also further discourages British companies from taking part in the rail market in their own country. Already, due to increasing premium payments and increasingly rigid franchise contracts, National Express has rid itself of all involvement, despite once being among the largest owning groups. With Stagecoach (and possibly Virgin) now potentially also soon to leave, and more contracts going to foreign state-backed enterprises, the picture looks even more bleak.

    These foreign state-backed concerns (including Abellio and Arriva, who are backed by German State rail operator DB) can afford to take on more risk because they have the backing of governments. This might be convenient for a Department wanting to move risk away from itself, but it isn’t fair on foreign taxpayers and leaves British companies (in fact, private companies of any kind) struggling to compete.

    We can at least take heart from the fact that Stagecoach are not taking this lying down. They are challenging the decision, as are Virgin, and I do hope they succeed in getting the decision reversed. I believe they have a strong case – after all, the Department for Transport has had all these bids for months, and nothing was said at the time of submission. It does seem rather strange to take months to notice something apparently so glaring.

    Even if they lose in a legal challenge, Virgin have a trump card – among a consortium of companies, they recently acquired domestic airline Flybe. The airline is to be rebranded as part of Virgin Atlantic and promises “improved connectivity at Manchester and London Heathrow”. Manchester and London, oddly enough, are prominent on the existing Virgin Trains route map, and will also be under the West Coast Partnership franchise. Coincidence? I think not.

    Alas, the time has now come for me to end my incoherent rambling and thank you for reading. Please do leave a comment if you feel inclined, and have a sublime morning/afternoon/evening/night (delete as appropriate).

    April 17, 2019
    2019, East Midlands, East Midlands Railway, East Midlands Trains, HST, Hydrogen, Meridian, Midlands, National Express, Rail, Railway, Railways, Stagecoach, Train, Trains, Virgin, Virgin Trains

  • Some Miscellaneous Myths

    Dear reader… gosh it has been a while. I had intended to write more, but alas life has been quite busy recently and the inspiration isn’t quite so easy at the moment. I’m sure you understand. In any case, it is a pleasure to once again have your company, at least for the next few minutes.

    The top item on today’s agenda (which you may have guessed if you read the title, you clever thing you) is myths. Given the rich tapestry of topics I usually mention here, it is rather unsurprising that from time time people believe things which are not quite true, and, this afternoon, I shall try to convince you, dear reader, not to believe them.

    (You must understand, before we begin, that I’m not trying to be a smart alec here; I genuinely used to believe some of these too)

    Myth 1: U-Boats Were Submarines

    Not that I would ever suppose to know your thoughts, dear reader, but I suspect many of you are thinking that I must have, in my over-month-long break, finally lost it. One might point out, with just a dash of indignation, that they submerged, didn’t they? Was this not what made them dangerous? Did we not hear that rather amusing story of a U-Boat being sunk by its toilet?

    The answer to all of these questions is at least a partial yes. However, most U-Boats spent most of the time on the surface, making them more boats that could submerge (submersibles) than submarines which could surface (a true submarine).

    This was because while U-Boats were powered by batteries underwater, they charged these batteries using diesel engines. These diesel engines needed (as diesel engines have an annoying habit of needing) oxygen, which they got from the ambient air, which the sea has an alarming lack of. The exhaust gases also need to go somewhere, and again the air is the ideal place. Hence they had to surface to recharge.

    While not exactly quick on the surface at a rather underwhelming 17.7 knots (that’s 20.4 mph), a Type VII U-Boat could only crawl along at an agonising 7.6 knots (just 8.7 mph) under the waves. There are many reasons for this, but one is that the hulls were really designed more for being boats on the surface, and didn’t cut through the water so well under the surface.

    Eventually, U-Boats were fitted with snorkels (no really, that is the term) which allowed them to take air and expend exhaust gases without having to surface. Newer types had much larger batteries and were much faster beneath the waves, thanks to better hydrodynamic design, but these types, while among the first real submarines, were a small minority.

    Myth 2: The Americans Spent Millions Developing a Space Pen; The Soviets Just Used Pencils

    This one is almost true. Both sides of the space race (the big one, not the Hydrogen one I mentioned last time) did initially use pencils.

    The pencil is of course a very simple device; when you use one, some graphite is scraped off the end, which gets stuck to the page and shows as the familiar dark grey mark. Not all of this graphite immediately adheres to the page, however. Some is dislodged and becomes dust, which isn’t really a problem on Earth since it falls to the ground harmlessly. In space, however, where the effects of gravity are far lower, this dust gets trapped in ventilation systems, gets stuck in instrument panels, and, since it’s also conductive, can cause electrical problems. This problem gets much worse if you snap the tip of the pencil.

    While pencils are sometimes not quite that risky, the space environment can also throw some other problems at the traditional writing instrument. There can be huge changes in pressure and temperature, and there is the risk that any gas dissolved in ink may diffuse out. Thus the Fisher Space Pen was developed to avoid these issues, but that really is a story for another day.

    Myth 3: You Can See the Great Wall of China From the Moon

    I admit that most of you probably do not believe this, but for those that do, let me explain.

    The Earth is actually quite small from the moon, and seeing any man-made object from that distance on the surface of Earth is near-impossible. None of the Apollo astronauts recorded seeing anything on the surface of Earth while on the moon.

    In fact, while we’re on the subject, it is really very difficult to see the Great Wall from space full stop. You see, it is made from stone which is not altogether different in colour from the stone in the mountains surrounding it. It also is relatively narrow (in the order of a few metres) making it hard to discern when seen from directly above at a distance of over 60 miles away while travelling at several thousand miles per hour.

    Much easier to see from space are cities, if we’re picking man-made objects. On the light side of Earth their much greater area makes them easier to spot and on the dark side the lights from cities make them extremely easy to spot. Indeed, this has given rise to many interesting phenomena, including the fact that you can always spot East from West Berlin because the former east Germany used lightbulbs that give off a slightly different colour of light.

    Myth 4: Bumblebees Shouldn’t Be Able to Fly

    This one is an odd one because, as is fairly obvious to anyone who has enjoyed a summer in England, Bumblebees do fly. The claim is that according to the “laws of aviation” (whatever that means) the Bumblebee should not be able to fly. I suppose the implication is that nature is way better than us at things, or perhaps someone was just trying to sound clever. We may never know.

    This is pure nonsense. As far as anyone can tell, the calculations that “prove” that bees shouldn’t be able to fly were very rudimentary, and were not intended for aircraft of that small a scale. They also ignore the interesting ways in which bees move their wings, and several entomologists (people who study insects) have spent considerable time debunking the myth.

    If there’s one good thing we can take out of the myth, it is this; always check your calculations – they may have limitations.

    Myth 5: Aircraft Flush Toilet Waste Out

    Again, not a difficult one to debunk this (when was the last time a frozen icicle of urine fell where you live?). This is quite obviously not the ideal solution to the problem – instead, toilet waste is retained in tanks on the aircraft and then removed at an airport by specialist vehicles. It isn’t completely unheard of to have a leak of the waste retention tank but it is quite unlikely.

    BUT: (some) trains do

    While almost all modern trains have retention tanks for toilet waste, this has not always been a requirement. Indeed, there are still many trains in the UK that do just flush toilet waste straight onto the track (this is why you should never flush the toilet in stations) and although they are due for replacement in the next few years this may take longer than planned.


    Well, I do hope you enjoyed that detour through some of the many small falsehoods people believe. Now, dear reader, we must part company again (unless of course you choose to read some of my other stuff), and all I can do is wish you a very pleasant day…

    April 11, 2019
    Air, bee, Bees, Bumblebee, Myth, Myths, Rail, Submarine, UBoat

Next Page

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • About
  • Home
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • PECULIARLY PETE
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • PECULIARLY PETE
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar